Open-Gov Questions Candidates are Afraid We'll Ask

Elections are the time when politicians pay the most attention to people and issues, and therefore the best time to ask them questions about how they plan to govern. OMB Watch wants your help in figuring out the best questions on government transparency that can be put to the candidates. Take just a few minutes to answer our survey and vote on your five favorite questions on the issue of government transparency and openness. We will then share the top questions with the news media and other organizations that have direct contact with candidates. Government openness affects every issue from budget and taxes, to the regulatory process, to non-profit advocacy. The range of questions tries to reflect this breadth so check them and see which are most important to you. Take the Open Government: What We Need To Know Survey today.

read in full

Projections of State Budget Shortfalls Deteriorate

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities released an update to their analysis last week, which now shows more than half of the states are facing a budget crunch in 2009. As we've commented, this isn't good news, as state budgets are far less flexible than the federal budget and usually are legally prohibited from running a deficit. From the CBPP update: More than half of states anticipate budget problems, according to this updated analysis of state fiscal conditions.
  • 19 states now project budget gaps for 2009. New Hampshire, Ohio and Wisconsin have joined this list since our last update
  • The combined budget shortfall for these 19 states in 2009 is now at least $32 billion.
  • 6 states now say they will have 2009 deficits, but have released no further information.
  • 3 other states project budget gaps for 2010 and beyond.
CBPP: 19 STATES FACE TOTAL BUDGET SHORTFALL OF AT LEAST $32 BILLION IN 2009

read in full

UPDATE: Senate Finance Stimulus Proposal Released

The Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus (D-MT) has now released the economic stimulus proposal that will be considered at Wednesday's Committee mark-up. For details and scores, see here later today. The proposal is along the lines described below, with these three main differences:

read in full

Tell the Senate Finance Committee Its New Rules Don't Go Far Enough

The Senate Finance Committee is considering new rules on Wednesday (Jan. 30) to increase transparency of the committee's meetings. While the proposed changes are a welcome step toward openness and transparency, the draft rules contain several serious problems. We need to give the committee quick feedback on these problems and get them fixed before Wednesday's markup. Most notable are the following three problems:

read in full

State of the Union: What To Watch Out For

Two Old Chestnuts, This Time With Meaning President Bush's last State of the Union (SOTU) tonight may be a sorry story of a slumping economy and a surge most striking in its slowness. He may set out a litany of missions unaccomplished, dressed up as ambitious agenda items for his final turn -- not. Reprise his failed attempts to revamp Social Security and overhaul immigration rules? uh-huh. More likely he will set the bar low, and focus on low-hanging fruit, easily achieved but of little real import.

read in full

Add-endum: Senate to Supplement Stimulus

Bigger Bang for Bigger Bucks, but Un-Paid For The Senate is expected to add approximately $20 billion in new provisions to the $146 billion stimulus package agreed to last week by House leaders and Treasury. Two of these provisions will probably be added in a Finance Committee mark-up on Wednesday afternoon; another may be added by the Agriculture Committee in the next couple of days. Additional amendments may come when the package comes to the floor before a final vote as soon as Thursday or by the middle of next week. As of now, the major items likely to be added in the Senate are:

    read in full

    Heritage Foundation Blog Responds to My Posts

    Writing on the Heritage Foundation's blog, The Foundry, rbluey calls me out for my bashing (here and here) of Brian Riedl's paper Tax Rebates Will Not Stimulate The Economy and recent statements he made in a BNA article($). The following is my response. Coming back to tenth-grade economics, in which we learn that "economic growth" refers to the change in the value of all goods and services (gross domestic product, or GDP) produced over a given time period in a given set of product and service markets, we can make any number of assertions that activity X will result in an increased value of such production. Riedl's paper relies on this definition economic growth ("By definition, an economy grows when it produces more goods and services than it did the year before."), but then claims that increased consumer expenditure, prompted by an increase in consumer income enabled by government transfers (i.e. tax rebates), do not, in fact cause the economy to produce more stuff in 2008 than it would have without such rebates. This is wrong (see e.g., CBO Director Peter Orszag, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke, Harvard Economics professor and former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and President Reagan's chief economic adviser Martin Feldstein, and former Clinton Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers).

    read in full

    DoD Unable to Control Contractors

    Another unbelievable story on contracting in the Washington Post this morning. Walter Pincus reports that government officials (including Jack Bell, deputy undersecretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness, Stuart W. Bowen Jr., special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, and William M. Solis, director of defense capabilities and management for the Government Accountability Office) testified before Congress that the Bush administration is unable to manage the enormous number of U.S. contractors currently working in Iraq and Afghanistan. At the end of September, there were over 196,000 contractor workers assisting the Department of Defense in the two war zones, and Defense Undersecretary Jack Bell stated that despite the crucial role these contractors play in the war effort, the Defense Department was "not adequately prepared to address this unprecedented scale of our dependence on contractors." The GAO also found not enough trained service personnel are available to handle outsourcing to contractors in the wars, a finding supported by Retired Army Gen. David M. Maddox, who has studied the contracting effort in Iraq as a member of an Army-appointed commission. This testimony was delivered at a joint hearing of two subcommittees of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee yestereday afternoon. And it is more than simply related to ensuring efficient management of the war effort - there's a lot of money involved here too. Subcommittee Chairman Tom Carper (D-DE) noted in a statement: Out of $57 billion worth of contracts for services and reconstruction work in Iraq, the Defense Contract Audit Agency has reported that more than $10 billion — or one-sixth of the total spent on contracts — is either questionable or cannot be supported because of a lack of contractor information needed to assess costs. To date, there are more than 80 separate criminal investigations into contracts totaling more than $5 billion. Here's a link to the committee page for the hearing where this testimony was heard, but it really won't do you much good as it doesn't have any testimony or information about the hearing other than who testified. Image by Flickr user jamesdale10 used under a Creative Commons license

    read in full

    GOP Earmarks Pledge: On Examination, Nothing There

    Tastes Great, Less Filling House and Senate GOP members are still on retreat in West Virginia today, with young turks battling old bulls over party policy on those nefarious earmarks. Informed sources and Porkbusters say that the earmarks donnybrook lies ahead on the agenda, when Rep. Jack Kingston's (GA) H. Con. Res. 263, a propoposal introduced last November to impose a six-month moratorium on all earmarks, will be taken up by the party in retreat.

    read in full

    OMB Watch Statement on the Stimulus

    OMB Watch released a statement on today's announced House-Administration proposed stimulus package, calling it "a good start" but noting that it "falls short of its stated goal of adequately stimulating the economy." However:

    read in full

    Pages

    Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government