"Cheaper" Suburban Housing Isn't

The now-cooling housing market, which had been growing at rapid clip, priced a lot of housing outside the reach of many middle-class workers. Looking for affordable housing, a lot of families have opted to move further out into the suburbs looking for cheaper housing. This would seem like a solution to the problem of ever-increasing home prices. Maybe not (WSJ, $$): Moving to an area with lower housing costs often doesn't pay off for low-income Americans, according to a study to be released today by the Center for Housing Policy, a nonprofit research group based in Washington.

read in full

FY 2006 Interest Expense up 23%

Following up on a recent blog post by my colleague Matt on interest expense, I wanted to point out yesterday's report by the Treasury that the government's net interest payments on the national debt reached $226.6 billion in FY 2006, an increase of 23 percent over FY 2005. (See the Monthly Treasury Statement, Table 9.)

read in full

Lower Deficit=Eroding Middle Class?

The President is mighty proud of the new deficit numbers. In fact, he called a press conference to say that the tax cuts he pushed have generated the surge in revenue that's partly responsible for the lower deficit this year. Hmmmmm. Well, corporate profits have gone way up, it's true. And he did cut taxes on corporate profits. There's a correlation there, for sure.

read in full

Attention Deficit

They must think we're not paying attention. Have a look at this statement, from an editorial in the Washington Post:

read in full

Hundreds of Economists Call for an Increase in the Minimum Wage

EPI has released a statement signed by over 650 economists calling for an increase in the federal minimum wage. As economists who are concerned about the problems facing low-wage workers, we believe the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2005’s proposed phased-in increase in the federal minimum wage to $7.25 falls well within the range of options where the benefits to the labor market, workers, and the overall economy would be positive.

read in full

$250 Billion FY2006 Deficit: Cause and Effect

To follow up on Matt's discussion below of the final deficit figures for FY2006, I thought I'd point to some of the wildly disparate explanations offered for it. Says Speaker Hastert, whose credibility right now is not exactly at an all-time high: "Republicans have cut the deficit in half three years ahead of schedule because they know that tax relief fuels America's economy." President Bush added a corollary last night: "Do we keep taxes low so we can keep this economy growing, or do we let the Democrats in Washington raise taxes and hurt the economic vitality of this country?"

read in full

Bush Celebrates $250 Billion Deficit

President Bush on the Treasury's announcement that the FY 2006 budget deficit is $248 billion: First, I want to briefly mention that today we've released the actual budget numbers for the fiscal year that ended on September the 30th. These numbers show that we have now achieved our goal of cutting the federal budget deficit in half, and we've done it three years ahead of schedule.

read in full

CBO's Final FY2006 Deficit Estimate: $250 Billion

The final CBO FY 2006 deficit estimate numbs are in … at a cool quarter of a trillion dollars. The $250 billion figure released today is well under CBO’s estimate of $337 billion at the beginning of the year and the $318 billion actual deficit for FY2005. Until this summer, the deficit projections were uniformly in the $300 billion-range, but a late surge in corporate income helped boost FY2006 revenues by $253 billion over last year’s total.

read in full

Bernanke on Budget Cuts

Another sign that the Bush Administration may push for "entitlement reform" (read: massive cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) after the election. From CongressDaily ($$):

read in full

The Other Public Interest

Shorter Sebastian Mallaby: Democrats have no principles because they won't cut Social Security for married low-income people. Snark aside, I bring this up because Mallaby and many of the entitlement-reform-obsessives around Washington are missing the point about fast-growing government spending. The fastest growing part of the budget are interest payments on the national debt. For more, Daniel Gross has a great article in Sunday's NYT explaining why interest payments have taken off.

read in full

Pages

Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government