Along with deficits rising, it appears the ratio of CEO pay to worker pay is also rising. As this United for a Fair Economy report highlights, CEO pay has shot up over the past few years, and now, while the average CEO makes $11.8 million per year, the average worker makes $27,460 per year. The ratio has spiked from 301-1 to 431-1. Perhaps even more unsettling news is that 46 large companies who made more than $30 billion in profits in 2003 paid absolutely no income taxes that year. Also, the report notes that the CEO's presiding over the most underfunded pensions had salaries that were, on average, 72 percent more than other CEO salaries. Congressional GOP leaders and the administration often mention the "strong economy" we are currently experiencing. It is important to remember that while the economy may look strong for some, it is not strong for many of the workers who are earning a disgracefully low minimum wage.

Many Republican leaders in the House and Senate are worried about the costs of rebuilding after Katrina, even though President Bush has promised, and rightly so, to devote all the funds needed to help the devastated region. Republicans who are worried about excessive deficit-financed spending are pushing for the costs will be offset (most are suggesting by cutting the budget elsewhere). To appease them, OMB Director Josh Bolten said Tuesday that the administration would consider offsets, but did not offer any details about what would be cut and by how much. As Stan Collender correctly points out (subscription required), any offsets proposed by the administration would to little, if anything, to reduce the amount Katrina relief spending will add to the deficit, and the national debt. Because President Bush refuses to even consider not extending or rolling back some of his first term tax cuts, it will be future generations who will be paying for reconstructing the Gulf Coast. The federal government is required by law to pay at least 75 percent of the cost of rebuilding public infrastructure after a disaster (1988 Stafford Act). To comply, Congress -- besides approving about $64 billion in emergency spending -- has agreed on a tax-relief bill to expand deductions this year for victims. The final bill was scored by the Joint Committee on Taxation as costing $6.1 billion over 10 years. Congress hopes these targeted tax cuts will spur employment of low-income workers on the Gulf Coast. In addition, President Bush signed three bills today to help in the aftermath of the disaster. The bills waive Pell Grant and other federal student loan requirements for displaced college students and expand Temporary Assistance to Needy Families eligibility for victims. CNN.com: House Passes Tax Breaks for Hurricane Katrina Victims

Congressional tax committees have set to work and are looking into how tax policy can be used to help victims of the recent disaster, both immediately and in the long run. Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee Charles Grassley (R-IA) told reporters in a morning news conference that his committee would be looking into relief efforts associated with past natural disasters in order to determine which policies have been effective. Then, they will look into applying similar policies to help those affected by Katrina. Meanwhile, in the House the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Bill Thomas (R-CA), is apparently exploring a three-phase approach addressing the initial humanitarian concerns, followed by infrastructure concerns, and finally long-term reconstruction. The first measure, which could move as early as September 8, deals with getting money to individuals through TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). The measure would remove a lot of red tape and provide immediate assistance for a number of families. Also, it is pretty clear that any sort of work on Social Security legislation is off the table now that Congressional leaders have their hands full dealing with the disaster. Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) told BNA News Services that "Major issues are overtaking a number of issues like Social Security. It's hard to foresee a legislative agenda addressing the long-term issues associated with Social Security this fall." Grassley made similar comments, telling reporters that his top priority this fall will be disaster-related measures, the Roberts nomination, budget reconciliation legislation and appropriation bills, and then Social Security.

Congress is more likely to act on pension reform than social security reform this year, according to today's BNA: "Congress ultimately may fail to find accord on Social Security reforms and instead pass more targeted pension reform legislation when it returns from its summer recess, sources who follow the issue told BNA Aug. 31." Michael Tanner, director of the Cato Institute's Project on Social Security Choice, told BNA Aug. 31 that Congress is likely to pass a pension bill, even if it fails to muster support for Social Security changes. "You could get a decent pension bill regardless of what happens with Social Security," Tanner said. Jason Furman, a senior fellow with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, rarely agrees with Tanner, a proponent of Social Security payroll tax-financed individual investment accounts. But Furman also said he expected Congress to act on pensions. "Something on the defined benefit [pension plan] side has to happen," Furman told BNA Aug. 31. Furman said he anticipated that Congress would feel compelled to pass provisions aimed at strengthening the funding of defined benefit pension plans and measures aimed at bolstering the federal pension insurer, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. "On Social Security, it is extremely unlikely that anything will be enacted by Congress. What the Republicans are trying to do is retreat from this issue," Furman said.