Senate Passes Product Safety Bill

Last night, the Senate passed a bill to reform the Consumer Product Safety Commission which would also mandate new safety standards for consumer products and toys. Like the House, which approved the bill Wednesday, the Senate passed the legislation with overwhelming bipartisan support, 89-3. Also yesterday, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said President Bush would sign the bill, despite some objections. That's great news for the beleaguered CPSC and for consumers. One important provision in the bill would ban certain phthalates, a chemical used in plastics, pending further study of their toxicity. This safety-first approach is a revolutionary concept for the federal government. OMB Watch has released a statement applauding the phthalate ban.

read in full

Product Safety Bill Overwhelmingly Approved by House

Last night, the House of Representatives gave its final approval to a bill to give more resources and authority to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). House members approved a package, negotiated among House and Senate leaders earlier this week, by a vote of 424-1.

read in full

On Phthalates, Congress Taking Safety-First Approach

After a protracted House/Senate negotiating period, Democratic and Republican leaders came to an agreement on several controversial provisions in a bill to improve consumer product safety. Early reports indicate that negotiators came down on the side of public health on most or all of the issues that had proved difficult to hash out. CQ.com reports:

read in full

Find out How Much You're Worth. Take our Trip around the Beltway.

Last week, Reg•Watch blogged about a recent Associated Press investigation that shows the Environmental Protection Agency has been using new statistics to assign monetary values to the lives potential regulations will save. AP found EPA's most recent value, $6.9 million, is about $1 million lower than it was five years ago. The figure in question is called a Value of a Statistical Life (VSL), which is a number that attempts to place a dollar figure on individuals by studying market data. EPA isn't the only agency that uses a VSL. Lots of public health and safety agencies go through the ridiculous process of valuing human life in order to comply with White House requirements on cost-benefit analysis. But agencies don't necessarily use the same VSL. Some agencies even use a different VSL for different rules. If you're wondering how much different sectors of the federal government think your life is worth, take our journey around the beltway, complete with an interactive map.

read in full

On Consumer Product Bill, More Work Remains

Yesterday, Reg•Watch asked the question, "Will Congress Wrap Up Consumer Safety Bill?" The answer turned out to be "no," as lawmakers' talks stalled during a meeting intended to finalize a version of a bill to reform the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Lawmakers did agree to set up a publicly searchable consumer product complaint database which was one of the controversial provisions that needed to be worked out.

read in full

Will Congress Wrap Up Consumer Safety Bill?

In a few minutes, members of the House and Senate are set to meet to work on sorting out differences between their respective versions of consumer product safety legislation. Both versions of the bill would expand the budget and authority of the beleaguered Consumer Product Safety Commission, but other provisions have proved contentious. Congress Daily (subscription) reports: The House passed its CPSC reauthorization in December and the Senate approved its version in March. Conferees first met last month, when they agreed on 21 items. They left the more troublesome measures for today.

read in full

Bush Administration Says Americans Are Worth Less

A recent Associated Press investigation shows the Environmental Protection Agency has been using new statistics to assign monetary values to the lives potential regulations will save. "The 'value of a statistical life' is $6.9 million, the Environmental Protection Agency reckoned in May – a drop of nearly $1 million from just five years ago," according to AP.

read in full

On Food Tracking, FDA Says "Not Our Responsibility"

The New York Times has an article this morning further underscoring the problems the FDA has tracking the sources of food-borne illness outbreaks. The toll of the current salmonella outbreak has exceeded 1,000 victims "in what officials said Wednesday was the largest food-borne outbreak in the last decade."

read in full

America's Wetlands Sullied by Supreme Court Decision

A 2006 Supreme Court decision has seriously hindered EPA's ability to enforce the Clean Water Act, according to new documents released by two House Committee chairmen. The decision in the case, which pertained to enforcement of the act in non-navigable wetlands, made a real mess of things. According to The Washington Post, "That 5 to 4 decision, known as Rapanos v. United States, held that the Army Corps of Engineers had exceeded its authority when it denied two Michigan developers permits to build on wetlands…"

read in full

Consumers Left in the Dark on Food Safety

Two stories today highlight the problems with tracking the path of contaminated food through the supply chain and how those problems impact public health. In the first story, from Washington Post reporter Annys Shin, we learn federal officials are now backing away from their earlier claim that tomatoes are responsible for the recent outbreak of a rare strain of salmonella. The news — a significant step backwards in identifying the problem, ensuring public health, and restoring peace of mind — comes more than three weeks after the tomato scare burst into the headlines.

read in full

Pages

Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government