New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

End of Fiscal Year Approaching

Fiscal year 2005 ends this Friday, Sept. 30, and House and Senate Republican leaders have not been able to pass all spending bills for FY 2006 on the floor. Thus, we can expect them to pass a stop-gap funding bill to cover federal government spending by the end of the week. According to an aide, GOP leaders in both chambers will push through a CR to fund government programs through Nov. 18. While some believe this extension will give appropriators sufficient time to wrap up their work on the outstanding FY 2006 appropriations bills, others think GOP leaders will not make their ambitious goal to pass all of the bills as separate measures this year. While the House has passed all eleven of its spending bills, the Senate has only passed eight of twelve, and only two of those have been given final approval and sent to Bush for his signature.

read in full

Calls for Fiscal Sanity Grow Louder

Amid misguided and mostly rhetorical proposals for cutting other areas of the budget to pay for Katrina relief (while continuing to cut taxes further), there is a strong and growing number of media outlets, political leaders, policy experts, and regular citizens who are demanding fiscal sanity return to the nation's capital. USA Today, the paper with the country's largest circulation, joined the ranks of those calling for a reassessment of the president's tax cuts. The paper specifically called out those lawmakers whose support of reckless tax and budget policies have caused many of the fiscal problems we have today. The paper editorialized:
    The current hypocrisy is that lawmakers who participated in the spending, borrowing and tax-cutting binge that put the nation in hock are now clamoring for spending cuts to offset storm costs...Their case would also be stronger if they would be willing to revisit recent tax cuts. The first law of holes is: When you're in one, stop digging. It would be the height of irresponsibility, for instance, to cut estate taxes when natural disasters, the Iraq war and surging health care costs are exploding the deficit.

read in full

GAO Comptroller: Evaluation of Tax Expenditures Necessary

Last Friday, General Accountability Office Comptroller David Walker strongly urged a "strategic, long range, and integrated" examination of tax expenditures to test their relevance and priority during a time when the federal budget is experiencing increasing strains. His comments came during the unveiling of a new GAO report recommending that the OMB and the Treasury take steps to ensure greater transparency of, and accountability for, tax expenditures. Walker emphasized to reporters, as he has in the past, the importance of putting the nation on a more "prudent and sustainable course for the long term." He insisted that doling out tax preferences has an impact on the government's bottom line, and at a time when we are experiencing high deficits, it is important to reevaluate some of those expenditures.

read in full

FEMA Report Vague on how Money is Being Spent

By law, the Secretary of Homeland Security must provide Congress with weekly reports detailing how FEMA is spending Katrina relief funds. The first report was sent to Congress September 15, and the second was sent yesterday. According to Rep. David Obey (D-WI) -- ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee -- the second report sent to Congress has virtually no details in it, much like the first report.

Obey said, "We asked for specific information on how they are awarding contracts and who contracts are going to. Instead of telling us who is doing what and how, we got a few spreadsheets." In order to get spending details, Obey and Senate ranking member Robert Byrd (D-WV) had specifically sent a letter to the OMB. Their requests, however, were not heeded, and their letter never answered. Instead of knowing how the money is being spent, Obey said, "We don't know what the administration is doing because they don't know what they are doing. We don't know where the nearly $16 billion FEMA's allocated went, we don't know what they're planning to do with the $44 billion they've got left."

read in full

2001 & 2003 Tax Cuts to Cost $225 Billion This Year

In an op-ed in today's Washington Post, E.J. Dionne, Jr. notes that although Republicans claim to be fiscally conservative, "our federal purse strings are in the hands of fiscal radicals." Spending in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina does have lawmakers on both sides of the aisle worried about potentially massive deficits. Some have been claiming a desire to take a fiscally responsible approach to spending, however cutting budgets while ignoring the costs of tax cuts is, in the long-run, not fiscally responsible at all. As was posted yesterday in the blog, members of the House Republican Study Committee proposed drastic funding cuts in order to offset Katrina spending; cuts that would -- as Dionne said -- take "$80 billion from Medicare and $50 billion from Medicaid over five years and suggest reductions in school lunches, rent subsidies for the poor and foreign aid, among other things." He goes on to point out, however, that the amount of money the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts is costing our country this year alone amounts to $225 billion -- which could more than cover the expected costs of dealing with Katrina. It doesn't, however, look like the Republican leadership is interested in pursuing this route to offset the costs of Katrina. Yesterday Bush pledged to join in on efforts to identify cuts elsewhere in the federal budget that can offset the expenditures for disaster aid, saying "I'm going to work with Congress to prioritize what may need to be cut." Cutting programs is the opposite of what needs to be done. In fact, many are arguing that a perpetual underinvestment in the infrastructure of our country is what allowed this disaster to spiral so radically out of hand in the first place.

read in full

Senate Completes Work on Two Approps Bills

The Senate passed two approprations bills yesterday to fund discretionary programs for FY 2006. The FY 2006 budget proposal for the Agriculture Department was voted on and passed 97-2. The bill includes $17.348 billion in discretionary spending and $82.81 billion in mandatory spending (total $100.158 billion). This amount was $506 million over the House's mark and the $597 million over the president's request. The Senate also passed their mark for the Military Quality of Life/Veterans Affairs Bill, recommending that $85.2 billion be appropriated for FY 2006. The House recommended the same amount of funding when they passed their mark in May, surpassing the President's request by $1.1 billion.

read in full

GOP Uses Katrina As Excuse To De-Fund Government

The Republican Study Committee (RSC), a conservative group of House Republicans, has released a 24-page proposal they are (not so) cleverly calling "Opperation Offset," which details $500 billion in budget cuts they are proposing to reduce the overall cost of Katrina relief and reconstruction. The proposal has created friction among Republicans in Congress because the RSC wants to institute cuts that rehash policies they have promoted for years, including significant cuts to NASA, Amtrak subsidies, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Peace Corps, foreign aid, the Earned Income Tax Credit, the national park system, community health centers, agricultural subsidies, and many, many more. Other Republicans believe proposals making up the majority of the cuts, such as delaying the Medicare prescription drug benefit by one year or repealing earmarks in the recently passed transportation bill are not realistic and might divide conservatives and moderates. Republican Party politics aside, this proposal is indicative of the "starve the beast" mentality that promotes huge tax cuts and then severe budget cuts to balance the budget. The result, unfortunately, is a dramatically decreased ability of the government to invest in communities and infrastructure. As was seen after the hurricane, these cuts do have consequences. The RSC's policies promote a short-term goal of shrinking government instead of a long-term investment agenda that will make the country more secure.

read in full

More On Cost of Rebuilding; Congress Passes Tax Bill

Many Republican leaders in the House and Senate are worried about the costs of rebuilding after Katrina, even though President Bush has promised, and rightly so, to devote all the funds needed to help the devastated region. Republicans who are worried about excessive deficit-financed spending are pushing for the costs will be offset (most are suggesting by cutting the budget elsewhere). To appease them, OMB Director Josh Bolten said Tuesday that the administration would consider offsets, but did not offer any details about what would be cut and by how much. As Stan Collender correctly points out (subscription required), any offsets proposed by the administration would to little, if anything, to reduce the amount Katrina relief spending will add to the deficit, and the national debt. Because President Bush refuses to even consider not extending or rolling back some of his first term tax cuts, it will be future generations who will be paying for reconstructing the Gulf Coast. The federal government is required by law to pay at least 75 percent of the cost of rebuilding public infrastructure after a disaster (1988 Stafford Act). To comply, Congress -- besides approving about $64 billion in emergency spending -- has agreed on a tax-relief bill to expand deductions this year for victims. The final bill was scored by the Joint Committee on Taxation as costing $6.1 billion over 10 years. Congress hopes these targeted tax cuts will spur employment of low-income workers on the Gulf Coast. In addition, President Bush signed three bills today to help in the aftermath of the disaster. The bills waive Pell Grant and other federal student loan requirements for displaced college students and expand Temporary Assistance to Needy Families eligibility for victims. CNN.com: House Passes Tax Breaks for Hurricane Katrina Victims

read in full

Watcher: September 20, 2005

Federal Budget
  • Katrina Could Cause a Needed Reevaluation of Priorities in Congress
  • Senate, House Pass First Katrina Tax Cut Package

read in full

Katrina Could Cause a Needed Reevaluation of Priorities in Congress

Hurricane Katrina has shaken up Congress' fall schedule immensely, as its focus has shifted to respond to the immediate needs of the Gulf region utterly devastated by the storm. Congress has passed more than $62 billion in aid, as well as Of the reconciliation measures laid out by Congress in April's budget resolution, some could prove to be extremely harmful. Reconciliation was expected to result in lawmakers:
  • cutting $35 billion from expected mandatory spending over five years ($10 billion was expected to be taken from Medicaid);

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources