New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

Administration Steers Away From Payroll Tax Diversion

Treasury Secretary John Snow indicated yesterday that the White House would in fact accept a form of Social Security overhall that did not include diverting a portion of payroll taxes into private investment accounts. This is a major shift in the administration's position. Snow said that personal accounts would be part of any Social Security legislation, but that they were open to funding these accounts through means other than the payroll tax. Congressional Democrats have almost unanimously opposed the idea of funding personal accounts with a diversion of payroll taxes. Bush's plan -- backed by many Congressional Republicans -- to allow individuals to put as much as 4 percentage points of their payroll tax contributions into private accounts has been one of the more controversial aspects of the discussion to overhaul Social Security. Opponents think that private accounts would would risk reducing benefits for low-income individuals, and also could result in higher interest rates because the government would need to borrow more to finance transition costs. In other Social Security news, an article in the New York Times today reports many Americans differ from Bush in their priorities regarding Social Security. A new New York Times/CBS News report showed that 51 percent of Americans believe investing a portion of payroll taxes into private accounts is a bad idea. Sixty-nine percent believed private accounts would be a bad idea if they would result in any benefit reductions, and 45 percent believed that private accounts would actually weaken the retirement system.

read in full

Greenspan Testifies Current Deficits Are Unsustainable

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testified before the House Budget Committee yesterday and painted a grim fiscal picture of the current state of the federal government. Greenspan noted decreasing the current deficits would require Congress and President Bush to make difficult political decisions. He said both decreases in spending and paying for future tax cuts would be necessary to tackle the deficit. Greenspan emphasized his long-standing position for the reinstatement of pay-as-you-go rules (PAYGO). These rules, a key aspect of the deficit reduction package that worked well in the 1990s, would require Congress to offset further tax cuts or increases in spending with savings elsewhere in the budget. The Bush administration and many top Republicans in Congress believe PAYGO rules should apply only to new spending. Read more about Greenspans testimony.

read in full

Opposition to Social Security Reform Pays Off

It appears as though all of this talk about a Social Security overhaul is not working in the President's favor. The Washington Post reports today, "President Bush's bid to restructure Social Security may have to wait until next year and might not involve the individual accounts the White House has been pushing hard." Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) expressed these sentiments yesterday, and they are a blow to the administration's obvious efforts over the last few months to market their plans for Social Security privatization. Many GOP Congressman have been out in the field pushing SS overhaul over the past few weeks, and many are now wary about forging ahead with a politically risky plan that doesn't have a good deal of demonstrated public support. So, it appears that Social Security reform may be put on the back burner for a while. This is due to both the fact that many Democrats have been voicing strong opposition to the private accounts supported by the administration, as well as because Republican lawmakers are extremely divided among themselves as to how to proceed with an overhaul, and whether or not our economy could sustain borrowing trillions of dollars to finance it. To read more about the current hurdles facing a Social Security overhaul, click here.

read in full

Tell Congress to Reject Bush's Misplaced Budget Priorities

The President’s budget lays out his priorities for the federal government for fiscal year 2006. These priorities include steep cuts to Medicaid, Food Stamps for working families with children, education, National Parks, and child care assistance, as well as to many other areas. The President's budget not only proposes cuts for the coming year, but proposes 5-year caps on the total amount for programs needing annual appropriations. Inflation alone will shrink these programs by 16 percent in the 5th year (2010). Take Action Now and Tell Congress They Can Do Better

read in full

Take Action on the Budget Resolution

Tell your members of Congress to oppose a budget resolution that would be harmful to many Americans as well as economically irresponsible. You can take action by clicking here.

read in full

SS Benefits Keep Millions of Seniors Economically Stable

In an op-ed column in today's New York Times, Paul Krugman argues that the GOP leadership's drive to create private Social Security accounts isn't about "finding a way to strengthen Social Security; it's about finding a way to phase out a system that conservatives have always regarded as illegitimate." Lawmakers will need to find a way to ensure that benefits aren't cut for Social Security recipients in the future, whether or not that includes some form of private accounts. They will need to do so, however, in a way that doesn't place those benefits at risk. Social Security benefits are currently responsible for keeping 13 million elderly people from living below the poverty line. If those benefits did not exist, almost 50 percent of elderly people would live below the poverty line. If the level of those benefits were to be put at risk through the creation private accounts, some seniors would fare well; however a number of them would end up losing out on thousands of dollars per year, and many household incomes would fall below the poverty line. Click here to see a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities that outlines the effect of Social Security on poverty among senior citizens. The report provides data on a state-by-state basis.

read in full

Business Week Supports Estate Tax

An editorial in this week's edition of Business Week came out in favor of a fair and responsible estate tax as a means to generate needed national revenue. The editorial said this: "An estate tax that protects families, small farmers,and businesses can still generate tens of billions of dollars in revenues. Letting lapse the income tax cut of the highest income bracket could also generate billions of dollars of tax revenue that could pay for the teachers and emergency responders who will lose their jobs under budget proposals to reduce federal aid to cities. The budget also calls for cuts in Food & Drug Administration inspections of imported food and medicine -- right after a British plant supply half the flu vaccine to the U. S. was closed due to contamination."

read in full

Reconciliation Measures

Today's CongressDaily News Service reports that GOP Congressional leaders are discussing whether to move separate reconciliation bills for entitlement spending cuts and tax cuts in the reconciliation process. They are also discussing the possibility of potentially moving a third reconciliation measure to increase the debt limit, currently set at $8.2 trillion. The debt limit was increased last November. CongressDaily reports: "These are the clearest signs yet that GOP leaders are serious about trimming entitlements for the first time since the 1997 balanced budget agreement. Reconciliation offers procedural protections for revenue and mandatory spending bills after successful adoption of the annual budget resolution. By de-linking legislation mandating savings in entitlement programs from a package of tax cut extensions, sources said, Republican leaders would seek to avoid unfavorable comparisons already being voiced by Democrats. "They would be concerned if tax cuts and cuts in critical services are in the same bill because people might think spending cuts for programs like Medicaid are being used to fund tax cuts," said Thomas Kahn, Democratic staff director for the House Budget Committee." This would indeed be the case if both entitlement spending and tax cuts were passed in the reconciliation process. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports, Bush's tax policies since 2001 account for 48% of our deficit, yet it is the spending on entitlement programs, such as medicaid and medicare, that are going to suffer from budget cuts in the name of fiscal responsibility. Keep checking the budgetblog for updates on the the reconciliation process as well as Congress' budget resolution.

read in full

The Trade Deficit and the Falling Dollar

As this article in today's Washington Post points out, America's overall indebtedness to foreigners now totals approximately $3 trillion dollars. The trade deficit in 2004 grew 24 percent to a record $617.7 billion. While the administration and Secretary of the Treasury John Snow are touting the trade deficit as economically beneficial, many economists are wary. In an op-ed piece in the Financial Times a few months ago, Snow wrote, "The deficit reflects foremost the strengths of the U.S. economy -- high productivity, strong U.S. growth relative to growth abroad, and the relative attraction of investing in our robust, dynamic economy, which has the deepest and most resilient capital markets in the world." Many economists many economists, however, see problems in the fact that as our trade deficit is growing, the money streaming into our country from foreign markets is not helping to finance a boom in assets such as factories and machinery; instead it is contributing to record levels of consumption based on credit by U.S. citizens. This consumption includes the ever-important oil, which our country continues to consume in very high levels. As Thomas Friedman writes in a New York Times column today, "We are importing too much oil, so the dollar's strength is being sapped as oil prices continue to rise. And we are importing too much capital, because we are saving too little and spending too much, as both a society and a government." This falling dollar without any checks on spending, he points out, could lead to problems down the road. He quotes former Clinton Commerce Department official David Rothkopf as saying "Given the number of people who have refinanced their homes with floating-rate mortgages, the falling dollar is a kind of sword of Damocles, getting closer and closer to their heads. And with any kind of sudden market disruption - caused by anything from a terror attack to signs that a big country has gotten queasy about buying dollars - the bubble could burst in a very unpleasant way." See this editorial in today's Times for more information on why the weak dollar is not currently helping our economic situation.

read in full

Chapter on Iraq Excluded from Economic Report

It was reported in the Washington Post this morning that the Bush administration purposely excluded a completed chapter on Iraq's economy from its Economic Report of the President, which was released a few days ago. The National Security Council requested the chapter be removed, reasoning not that there was sensitive data that could lead to increased security concerns, but that the "feel-good" tone of the chapter would make the administration look bad amid continuing violence. This is an extreme and unprecedented decision by the Bush administration. The Council of Economic Advisors (CEA), who produces the report, is supposed to be an independent entity and its members have long prided themselves on their academic integrity. While there have been disagreements between White House staff and members of the council over past reports, the deletion of an entire completed chapter was described by former CEA members as "extraordinary," and "extreme." This decision paints a broader picture of the Bush administration and the CEA with respect to policy analyses. Former CEA member under President Reagan William Niskanen said this showed that the council had been significantly weakened. Others observers are afraid this is just one more example of an administration that does not value lengthy, reasoned analyses of its policies. A former policy advisor to Presidents Reagan and Bush I, Bruce Bartlett commented, "They just don't seem to show that serious study is an important part of politics. [The current Bush administration] takes a very casual, hands-off, almost lackadaisical approach to the policy process."

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources