CBO-Based Iraq War Cost Projections Swallow Surplus

Amid growing controversy about budget war costs in Iraq, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has reneged on the commitment he made to Buduget Committee chair Kent Conrad (D-ND) and ranking member Judd Gregg (R-NH) during his confirmation process that he would present the FY08 Defense budget to the Senate Budget Committee next week (something Donald Rumsfeld never did). As we noted in FY2008 -- Mixed Budget Signals, the administration, presumably seeking to keep the enemy, as well as Congress guessing about it

read in full

Rangel, McCreary Crafting Min. Wage Tax Package

As reported here yesterday, House Ways and Means chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) has agreed to offer a tax package counter-proposal to the Senate's $8.3 billion, ten-year package, approved last week as part of S. 2, the Senate minimum wage bill. Rangel is collaborating with Committee ranking member James McCreary (R-LA) to craft a package that will clear the Committee and the House quickly. Reports are that they will put a $1-1.5 billion proposal before the Committee for mark-up on Monday, but the elements of the package are still under discussion.

read in full

Even When We Can Privatize, We Shouldn't

George Will's column today reveals a great deal about the attitude in part driving privatization. The City of Chicago has leased important public assets for big short-term gains, including the Chicago Skyway, a massive toll road. Will is pleased. But privatizing is a long-term loss for the city and a long-term gain for the private companies. Will ignores this fact, suggesting that the private companies that bought the skyway are heroically bearing risk.

read in full

Update: Monday Mark-Up for $1 B Rangel Tax Bill

This just in, per today's CongressDaily ($): House Ways and Means Chairman Rangel said this afternoon he would move to break the House-Senate stalemate over minimum wage legislation by marking up a small business tax bill next Monday [which] he expects it to be "in the vicinity of $1 billion." It will also include about $1 billion in offsets to make it revenue neutral. Rangel insisted for weeks on passage of a "clean" minimum wage bill -- one containing no tax breaks. Today, Rangel insisted that he will not let his arm be twisted in conference negotiations over the size of the tax package.

read in full

The Long Arm of Dick Cheney

Yesterday on Capitol Hill, two top government investigators testified before the House Homeland Security Appropriations Committee that their investigations have been obstructed - specifically because of delays they have encountered in dealing with the department's office of general counsel. This office just happens to be headed up by Philip Perry, Vice-President Dick Cheney's son-in-law. Philip Perry (arrow) w/ In-LawsPhoto: Robert Galbraith / REUTERS

read in full

Rangel to Offer Minimum Wage Bill Tax Compromise; Weighing Offsets, Objectives, and Opportunity Costs

House Ways and Means Committee chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) has dropped subtle hints before, as we have noted, that he would consider a compromise on the $8.3 billion tax cut package the Senate attached to the minimum wage bill it passed last week. But speaking to reporters yesterday, Rangel now says he is "prepared to send something over there for [the Senate] to be able to attach a tax package" for the sake of getting the bill to the President's desk.

read in full

More Wishful Thinking in the President's FY 08 Budget

We have showcased a number of omissions, deceptions, and exaggerations this week within the president's FY 08 budget proposal, but another fine point was uncovered this week as well that missed our notice. It concerns assumptions for how much revenues will grow over the next five years.

read in full

Ruth Marcus: Bush To Raise Taxes So He Can Claim He Won't Raise Taxes

In the Washington Post today, Ruth Marcus recognizes that Bush is relying on a tax increase via the AMT to claim that he can balance the budget without raising taxes. Looked at another way, what the Bush tax cuts give to taxpayers, the AMT grabs back. By 2012, if it isn't changed, the AMT would take back almost one-third of the Bush tax cuts...it would take back more than half of the tax cut for people making between $100,000 and $200,000.

read in full

Jump-Starting or Short-Circuiting Entitlement Debate?

An article in today's Wall Street Journal, On Deficit Cutting, Skeptics Abound remarks that the President's FY 2008 budget projections "still don't account for several big potential budget-busters, as budget analysts and Democratic critics were quick to note yesterday," making the point unflinchingly in this graph: Inexplicably, however, the article closes with what appears to be a stray talking point from an administration official (perhaps dated January, 2005?):

read in full

Deficit Fix-ation: AMT = Allowing More Taxation?

President Bush's FY 2008 budget proposal provides numerous projections calculated to prove the plausibility of his overall goal of eliminating the deficit budget by 2012 -- the only problem being the implausibility of the projections themselves. We have highlighted in our commentary on the budget and elsewhere some of the more conspicuously convenient calculations regarding war spending and AMT reform. CBPP expands upon the latter point in a paper released today, and relates it to a more plausibile assumption -- the extension of Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts -- arguing that

read in full

Pages

Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government