With reconciliation moving full steam ahead, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) of the finance committee commented, "I have never felt that a budget going through the Congress of the United States is more disconnected from reality than this budget." It truly is disconnected -- the Senate Budget Committee yesterday approved a spending blueprint which would cut $39 billion from mandatory programs over the next five years. Overall the bill would actually produce $71 billion in gross savings, but would put about $32 billion of those savings back into new spending. The legislation will likely be considered on the House floor next week. House Republican leaders are currently still working to put together 218 votes for support for a larger $50 billion plan. Some Republicans, including Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-CA) have privately expressed frustration to House leaders over the increased spending cut targets. Ways and Means, for example, is now being pressured to cut $8 billion, which is up from $1 billion in the original FY06 budget resolution.

House and Senate appropriators have mapped out a plan for finishing work on all 11 appropriations bills before Thanksgiving, however there is some speculation that reconciliation will force GOP leaders to work slowly on appropriations to keep pressure on members to stay in town into December to complete other unfinished business. Congressional conferees are expected to wrap up work on the FY 2006 Agriculture spending bill this week, and if all goes according to plans, appropriators may complete negotiations on a $30.5 billion FY06 Energy and Water bill this week. The week of November 7 they are hoping to complete work on the Defense spending bill (including $50 billion for overseas military operations), as well as the Science-State-Justice-Commerce and Military Quality of Life measures. Their ambitious plan also includes passage of the Labor-HHS and Transportation-Treasury bills the week before Thanksgiving, as well as a short-term continuing resolution (the current CR expires Nov. 18) to give President Bush time to sign remaining spending bills into law. We'll see if they will actually be able to come to a consensus on reconciliation and tackle all of this approps work in the weeks ahead.

The House will set to work on the reconciliation budget bill tomorrow, with markups in eight separate committees. The Energy and Commerce Committee will be looking to trim as much as $12 billion from Medicaid over five years. These cuts could be problematic for some members of the Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans such Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM), who was responsible for sending a letter to Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle back in April, asking him to remove reductions to Medicaid in the reconciliation instructions. The letter was signed by 43 other Republicans, including former leader Tom Delay, Speaker Dennis Hastert, and House Whip Roy Blunt. The cuts to Medicaid which would be included in the House budget reconciliation bill would, unlike the Senate Finance Committee proposal, hit Medicaid beneficiaries directly. The House reconciliation instructions will also look at ANWR, offshore drilling, and LIHEAP funding. According to BNA, on Wednesday and Thursday of this week two House committees "plan to mark up language that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, expand offshore oil and gas exploration, and increase federal assistance to low-income families that need help paying their winter heating bills." Opening the ANWR coastal plain to oil and gas leasing is projected to raise $2.4 billion over five years (although this money is not guaranteed), yet will have a number of environmental consequences and do little to alleviate national dependancy on oil. House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Joe Barton (R-TX) also plans to ask for an extra $1 billion to fund LIHEAP, which provides heating and cooling assistance to one out every five American families. In the Senate there have been two amendments to increase LIHEAP funding by $3.1 billion. Each of the two votes, which were procedural, have been rejected; however in anticipation of a 50 percent increase in heating bills many will be experiencing this winter, it is almost certain funding will go up significantly. The White House is expected to request a third supplemental spending bill for hurricane recovery by the end of this week, and that could potentially be a vehicle through which LIHEAP funding could be increased.

Spending in the wake of Hurricane Katrina has elicited a lot of yelling and screaming from all sides, with worries ranging from how much we are spending, to how we will offset that spending, to whether or not tax and budget cuts are necessary or wise in the wake of the disaster. A new round of legitimate worries has gained more momentum recently, specifically over which giant corporations are getting government contracts, why they are getting those contracts, what their ultimate development goals are, and whether or not they are receiving too much money for the services they are providing (and thus wasting taxpayer dollars). Halliburton has been the focus of much of this attention for receiving tens of millions of dollars from the Republican administration to work on rebuilding the Gulf Coast. Now, many are questioning the deal struck between the government and Carnival Cruise Lines, which is housing displaced hurricane victims on three of their cruise ships. The company is receiving $236 million for this six-month contract, to cover the costs of using the ships, and also to compensate for lost revenue Carnival would have received if the ships were stocked with paying vacationers. The disconnect here, however, is that Carnival Cruise Lines is possibly making significantly more money than they should be, and thus wasting disaster-relief funds which are badly needed in many areas. The cruise line earned $150 million in revenue over a 6 month period (the data came from 2002), which is significantly lower than the $236 million being allocated to the company. (A spokeswoman for Carnival noted that revenue was down because it was the year following the September 11 attacks, but did not provide data to back up this statement). On top of this, many of the cruise line's entertainment services and staff -- a big chunk of their expenditures, no doubt -- will not be needed or used by the company over the next six months, thus arguably bringing costs even lower than $150 million. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) is a key lawmaker investigating this issue, and he sent a letter to Dept. of Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff yesterday demanding more accountability and transparency in federal contracting. The letter asks DHS to provide the following information:

All documentation regarding calculations of lost revenue provided by Carnival Corporation to justify the cost of the contract;

All documentation regarding the calculations of expenses incurred under normal operations and under the charter contract that were provided by Carnival Corporation to justify the cost of the contract;

All documentation regarding the decision to reimburse Carnival for federal taxes owed while under the charter contract; and

Any documentation regarding the development of the provision calling for return of excessive profits by Carnival.

In a time when lawmakers are calling for harsh budget cuts to offset the costs of Katrina-related spending, it is imperative that funds are not wasted through excessive government handouts to these major corporations. Lawmakers, who are responsible for these contracts, should know what the cost estimates for certain contracts should be and not be duped into paying more than what is necessary.