Do Your Job, Congress

Things are moving forward on a plan to create a panel (CQ, $) of legislators who'd come up with proposals to curb long-term fiscal problems. If created, the commission will no doubt propose legislative packages of "tough choices," a euphemism for painful legislation that'll cut benefits here and raise taxes there, with the intention of reducing the long-term budget imbalance, but not producing any tangible benefit for the public.

read in full

Resolution Tea-Leaf Reading: The Conrad Lexicon

If you found Senate Budget Committee chair Kent Conrad's comments on the Budget Resolution quoted in our blog yesterday inscrutable, you are not alone. Policy wonks, journalists, lobbyists, industry groups, and aides have spent much of the past two days trying to interpret the meaning of Conrad's promise, "no tax rate increases," given his broader promise of balancing the budget by 2012. So we offer an abridged Conrad Lexicon, to assist in parsing the delphic utterance:

read in full

Wyden's Health Care Plan Could Save $1.5 Trillion

Here's an interesting study of Sen. Ron Wyden's plan to provide health care insurance for all Americans. It estimates that the plan would slow the growth of health care costs by nearly 1 percent, a reduction in total health care spending (public and private) of about $1.5 trillion over ten years. You can agree or disagree with Wyden's plan (I think it relies too much on private insurers and doesn't go far enough to control costs). What's inarguable is that providing more health insurance would control costs in a moral and effective way.

read in full

War Supplemental Mark-Ups "Targeted"

Coming to a chamber floor near you! CQ($): The House Appropriations Committee has set a "target date" of March 7 to mark up the fiscal 2007 supplemental measure, Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis., the committee chairman, said Wednesday. The goal is to bring the bill to the floor the following week. The Senate Appropriations Committee intends to mark up its own version of the bill March 20, according to its chairman, Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has said he would like to have the bill on the floor the last week of March. Last week of March - mark your calendars.

read in full

Bush's $526 Billion Tax Increase

Congress's Joint Committee on Taxes has put out a preliminary examination of the Bush health care tax plan. Over the next ten years, they estimate it would raise taxes by $526 billion. President Bush had claimed the package would be a wash in net. Check out this AP article for more: President Bush's health insurance proposals would cost taxpayers $526 billion through 2017, according to a preliminary estimate from Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation.

read in full

Democrats to Reach Balanced Budget by Different Means

The broad outlines of the Democrats' FY 2008 Budget Resolution strategy are beginning to emerge. This much is now clear, per comments this week by House and Senate Budget Committee chairs Rep. John Spratt (D-SC) and Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND):
  • the BR will set total discretionary spending above the $929.8 billion cap proposed by President Bush
  • it will provide for a balanced buget by FY 2012, by increasing revenues "without any tax rate increases"; instead, it will "broaden the base and keep rates low"

read in full

A Bid for a Mimimalist Minimum Wage Bill

Has Reid been Reading Us? It may be impatience, or posturing, or good policy (in our view), but for whatever reason, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) threatened last night to scotch the minimum wage tax package negotiations and schedule a(nother) vote on a "clean" minimum wage hike.

read in full

Children's Health Insurance Program Rundown

SCHIP, a federal health insurance program for low-income children and pregnant women, has been making news lately (CQ ($) has a good article on it). Here's a quick rundown of what's been happening:

read in full

Fiscal Stakes in the Minimum Wage Tax Packages

If you think the choice between the House and Senate minimum wage tax packages is a coin-toss between two fully-offset, revenue-neutral, fiscally fungible approaches, think again. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' paper released today, Small Business Tax Package In Senate Minimum Wage Bill Poses Fiscal Risks, makes a strong case against the Senate's $8.3 billion package, built on two arguments:

    read in full

    WSJ Tax Hacks vs. AMT Facts

    Linda Beale, law professor at Wayne State University Law School, provides a much more detailed rejoinder to the Wall Street Journal piece, Bill Clinton's AMT Bomb," than we could in our blog yesterday. Her main points are as follows:
    • The 2001-2006 tax cuts passed by the Republican-dominated Congress and the Bush Administration were packaged with no plan to repeal the AMT, since AMT revenues were needed to pretend that the tax cut package was considerably cheaper than it was known to be

    read in full

    Pages

    Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government