SIGTARP Hold Lifted

It appears that the anonymous hold on Neil Barofsky, President Bush's nominee for the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program has been lifted. The Senate is expect to proceed expeditiously when they return to action next week.

There's no word, however, on the identity of the anonymous holder.

read in full

TARP: Additional Actions Needed to Better Ensure Integrity, Accountability, and Transparency

That's the title of a report released today by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The report, prescribed by the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) legislation, is the first of a recurring series to the appropriate committees of Congress and the Special Inspector General for TARP.

read in full

TARP Oversight Continues Down Bumpy Road

One of the oversight bodies created by the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) legislation is the Congressional Oversight Panel. The panel -- composed of five members appointed by Congressional leadership -- has only recently been named, but has held briefings with Treasury Department officials.

read in full

TARP Oversight Helped, Hindered by Senate

A pair of bills designed to improve oversight of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) has been introduced in the Senate. The first would place restrictions on the use of federal funds and provide greater transparency, and the second would strengthen the role of the Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP). TARP was created by the $700 billion financial bailout bill that Congress passed before the election.

read in full

A Few Trillion More Than 700 Billion

Updated: See below.

read in full

Oversight Coming to a TARP Near You?

After $290 billion in TARP funds committed, President Bush and the Senate are just now getting around to installing the TARP Inspector General. Working quickly to confirm Bush's choice for Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP), Neil M.

read in full

TARP Purchases Increasing as Oversight Languishes

As Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson continues to purchase hundreds of billions of dollars in bank equities under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), oversight of the program remains meager. TARP, as created through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA), gives Paulson wide latitude in selecting firms and individuals to implement the program and equally wide latitude in disbursing the $700 billion in authorized funds. However, with $290 billion already committed, two of three oversight institutions created by EESA have yet to be implemented, signaling that oversight and transparency in TARP are second-tier objectives for Congress and the Treasury Department.

read in full

Paulson: Troubled Asset Relief Program Will Not Buy Troubled Assets

Rethinking the crux of the financial markets crisis and its solutions, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced today that the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), originally intended to take toxic financial assets off the books of lending institution

read in full

Treasury Releases TARP Transaction, First Tranche Reports

On the Depart of Treasury Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA, AKA TARP) website, the Department has posted, according EESA law, a list of transactions made under TARP. And here they are, all $125 billion* worth of them:

read in full

TARP Accounting: More than One Way to Follow the Law?

The Congressional Budget Office reported in its Monthly Budget Review for October that the federal budget deficit for that month will be $134 billion. But CBO predicts that when the Treasury Department releases the official deficit number later this month, it will be $232 billion.

The $98 billion gap is the product of differing interpretations on how purchases under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) should be scored. According to CBO:

...the stock investment and associated warrants should not be recorded on a cash basis but on a net present value basis, accounting for market risk, as specified in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. CBO's preliminary estimate of $17 billion for the present value cost is included in its estimate of $134 billion for the October deficit.

So far, Treasury has purchased $115 billion in bank stocks. Treasury says that this will increase the budget deficit by $155 billion, while CBO says it should increase the deficit by $17 billion.

This is an interesting development, as the potential impact on the budget deficit could be hundreds of billions of dollars, depending on whether Treasury follows the law, and uses a present value calculation -- the method employed in CBO's estimate, or if it continues to use a cash basis of accounting. There are a number of ramifications that could result from these accounting differences.

  • A larger budget deficit figure may impose constraints on future fiscal policy
  • Cash-basis accounting of these assets deviates from current practice. For example, a student loan is not counted as a cash expenditure, but as an asset, as the government expects to see the principal repaid
  • The future sale of purchased bank stock would appear to decrease the budget deficit. This could open the door to manipulation by an administration seeking political gains to be had from decreasing the federal budget deficit.

read in full

Pages