By Robert Shull and Gary Bass
The deadly mine disaster that took place in Sago, West Virginia represents an enormous tragedy. It is now natural to wonder not just whether the mining company provided adequate protections for workers but also whether the federal government has done enough. If recent history is any guide, those answers aren't likely to reassure the public.

Since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced plans on Sept. 21 to reduce TRI chemical release reporting, the agency has faced an ever-growing flurry of criticism and opposition. The program receives tremendous support, because for nearly 20 years it has been an essential tool in addressing environmental and public health concerns. In response to EPA's proposals to cut reporting on TRI chemical releases, in order to eliminate paperwork for reporting companies, individuals and organization have expressed outrage and begun to rally around the program.