Interior Department Gets in on the Scientific Manipulation Fun

The New York Times reports this morning that an Interior Department manager has been ignoring science to pursue a political agenda. Julie A. MacDonald, the deputy assistant secretary for fish, wildlife and parks, became the subject of an agency Inspector General investigation after repeated complaints by employees: Ms. MacDonald, an engineer by training, has provoked complaints from some wildlife biologists and lawyers in the agency for aggressive advocacy for industries' views of the science that underlies agency decisions. The words of more than a dozen high-ranking career employees … describe a manager determined to see that agency findings and the underlying science conform with policy goals. The article points out MacDonald's reckless actions make many agency decisions overly vulnerable to legal challenges. "Making decisions that are vulnerable increases the risk that time-consuming, labor-intensive scientific and regulatory work must be redone."

read in full

More OMB Manipulation of Climate Science

As Reg•Watch blogged earlier, the Government Accountability Project released a report detailing Bush administration political interference in climate science. The report includes evidence of manipulation by OMB. For example, the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) is supposed to be a clearinghouse for accurate and up-to-date climate science produced by agencies. Unfortunately for the American people, OMB is one of the overseers of CCSP. According to the GAP report, OMB and other political offices sit on a panel that must approve CCSP communications. The panel has approved startlingly little information. It is worth noting that since 2004, CCSP has cautiously produced and posted on its website only five fact sheets and two research summaries, all ranging from two to four pages in length. It issued eight press releases — three of which were administrative announcements — and held one workshop on November 14-16, 2005. Furthermore, with the exception of three press releases, CCSP has not produced any new material as of January 2006. That's not much product from a staff of 14. (Current staff-level according to CCSP website).

read in full

OMB Manipulates Climate Science Communication

Yesterday, the Government Accountability Project (GAP) released a report on the organization's year-long investigation into political manipulation of federal climate science. The report focuses on how Bush administration politicos interfere in climate scientists' communications with the media and Congress. The report accuses OMB of participating in the manipulation. In one instance, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was preparing formal responses to questions posed during a Senate hearing on climate change. OMB reviewed the draft and inserted text which "attributed global warming to increasing water vapor, in reliance on a quote taken out of context from a scientific paper." The text was finally removed, but not until the paper's author intervened. Water vapor?!? That kind of logic wouldn't fly in a junior-high earth science class, let alone the United States Senate. Stay tuned as Reg•Watch posts more examples of OMB interference uncovered in GAP's eye-opening report.

read in full

Dudley May Return to the Hill for Confirmation Hearing

OMB Watch has learned a Senate panel may formally reconsider the long dormant nomination of Susan Dudley to become the White House's regulatory czar. Dudley — whose 2006 nomination stalled in the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee (HSGAC) — could reappear before that committee if Chairman Joe Lieberman (I-CT) pushes forward. In 2006, President Bush nominated Dudley to be administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within OMB. Dudley blindly opposes any form of government regulation regardless of its potential benefit to society, thus making her an illogical choice to head the office which reviews the rules agencies develop. Because of this, public interest groups opposed Dudley's nomination, and a Republican-controlled HSGAC did not think it a high enough priority to address last fall. Never to be discouraged by the opinion of the people he governs, Bush renominated Dudley in January. A day later, Bush named Dudley a senior advisor in OIRA. If HSGAC decides to reexamine Dudley's record, we certainly hope they will realize she is not fit for the position and reject her nomination. If not, we expect Bush to appoint her during a Congressional recess this year. Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for more. For the full story on Dudley, check out Public Citizen and OMB Watch's report The Cost Is Too High.

read in full

NY Times on FDA Conflict-of-Interest Proposal

The New York Times has a nice editorial about FDA's new proposal to reduce conflicts of interest on agency advisory committees. (See Reg•Watch's dissection from yesterday.) Read the editorial here.

read in full

Markey Speaks out on Fuel Economy

Grist, an environmental news and commentary website, has conducted an interesting interview with Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA). Among other issues, Markey addresses his proposal to raise CAFE standards — the federal rule that governs passenger vehicle fuel efficiency. Markey discusses the prospects for passage of his bill, and ties President Bush's failure to strengthen American fuel economy to his failed Iraq strategy. Better Off Ed, from Grist.

read in full

A Failure to Govern: Bush's Attack on the Regulatory Process

AFtG A Failure to Govern: Bush's Attack on the Regulatory Process outlines President Bush's recent changes to the regulatory process. The report details the potential impacts the changes will have on federal agencies and the American public, as well as what the changes mean to democracy at large.

read in full

Scrutinize the FDA Day!

Reg•Watch is retroactively declaring March 22, 2007 Scrutinize the FDA Day (see below). Here's one more bit of news before this soon-to-be widely celebrated holiday comes to a close. This morning, the House Energy and Commerce Committee subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held its second hearing on the FDA drug approval process. Panel Democrats grilled FDA commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach on how the agency has become powerless in regulating drugs, especially after they reach the market. Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-MI) repeatedly criticized the culture at FDA as a contributing factor. OMB Watch has reported on the increasing need for reform in the agency's drug approval process. The hearing also featured testimony from Marcia Crosse — not the desperate housewife, but the Government Accountability Office director for health care. Crosse's testimony pointed out FDA has begun initiatives to correct some of the problems detailed in a 2006 GAO report, but it is too soon to tell how effective those reforms will be. Also of note, at least one lawmaker, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) mentioned FDA's new guidance on advisory members which Reg•Watch mentioned earlier today.

read in full

FDA Risk Assessment Favorable to Food from Clones

The New Standard has published an article outlining how the FDA has "cherry-picked" data in formulating a favorable risk assessment for food products from cloned animals. Read the article here. Read the Center for Food Safety report on the issue here. Read the FDA draft risk assessment here.

read in full

Breaking down FDA's New Conflict-of-Interest Proposal

In today's New York Times, there appears a story by reporter Gardiner Harris about FDA's new guidance intending to reduce conflicts of interest on agency advisory boards. (Note: The story refers to the proposal as "rules" but it is actually "draft guidance" which, unlike rules/regulations, does not carry the force of law.) The guidance is a response to an increasing problem at FDA: Scientists determining the public safety of drugs and medical devices often have financial ties to the products or industry on which they are commenting. There are pros and cons to the draft guidance. The good:

read in full

Pages