More on the Mid-Session Review
by Craig Jennings, 7/11/2006
As the spender-in-chief pats himself on the back for managing to shirk the deficit to the fourth largest in U.S. history (via ThinkProgress), let’s take a look at a few things:
1. The surge in tax receipts is the result of a growing economy. Economic expansion is not dependent on tax rates. In fact, President Clinton raised taxes and the economy grew at what most would call a "good" pace. If marginal tax rates are 1% or 99%, an expanding economy will result in increased revenues.
2. The OMB has a habit of projecting of unrealistically large budget deficits so that the president can laud his tax policies for producing lower-than-expected deficits.
- In 2004, the president’s budget projected a $521 billion deficit for FY2004 that turned out to be $412 billion
- In 2005, the president’s budget projected a $426 billion deficit for FY2005 that turned out to be $318 billion
