
Congress Passes Sweeping Lobbying and Ethics Reforms
by Sam Kim, 8/7/2007
After a year-long debate and negotiations over enacting lobbying and ethics reforms, Congress finally passed the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 (S. 1). While not an ideal set of reforms, the new law is the most significant lobbying and ethics reform in a decade and should make important strides in increasing accountability and transparency in Washington.
The reform package, which overwhelmingly passed the House on July 31 (411-8) and the Senate on Aug. 2 (83-14), strengthens the Lobbying Disclosure Act and includes important earmark disclosure provisions that will allow the public to view the sponsors of congressional earmarks on the Internet. The legislation also requires the disclosure of coalitions that control lobbying efforts but protects the identity of donors and members, bans lobbyists from paying for travel or gifts for members of Congress and staff, strips pensions of members convicted of certain felonies, and contains a cooling-off period for staff and members of Congress before they can lobby their old offices again.
This bill was the top priority for Democratic leaders this year in Congress. After winning a majority in both the House and Senate in the wake of numerous bribery, earmarking and lobbying scandals in 2006, the Democrats made these reforms the first piece of legislation they undertook in the Senate, passing it 96-2 in January. A similar measure passed overwhelmingly in the House by a 396-22 margin on May 24.
Yet the momentum to pass the law stalled during the summer as the issues of bundling campaign contributions and the cooling off period for members and staff before moving into the private sector became highly contentious. Further complicating the negotiations, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) wanted assurances that the conference between the House and Senate would keep strong earmark disclosure provisions, and when he did not receive them, he blocked appointment of conferees, effectively stalling, if not killing, the legislation.
While the Senate's earmark disclosure language was stronger than previously passed House rules, DeMint's actions forced Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to compile a compromise bill outside of the conference committee structure and pass it again in both chambers. By passing identical bills, Congress did not need a conference and could send the legislation directly to the president for his signature. While this strategy ultimately succeeded, it removed some transparency from the drafting process and led to minor changes in legislative language in the bill that weakened it slightly.
The provision to have lobbyists disclose bundling of campaign contributions was softened by raising the dollar threshold and by reporting every six months instead of quarterly. The Senate agreed to have a two-year cooling off period from lobbying Congress when moving to the private sector; the House kept the current one-year period. There was also some additional controversy with DeMint and Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) claiming that the secret bill writing process resulted in weakening the earmarks provision.
Nonetheless, the final bill is a major step forward in reducing the "culture of corruption" that the Democrats talked about in last year's election. The bundling provision and two other provisions — a new database providing public access to data about lobbying and ethics, and an elimination of secret holds in the Senate — could have a significant impact on the way Washington operates.
At the same time, the new law is not perfect. One of the most glaring omissions from the lobbying and ethics reforms are provisions to require reporting of big money grassroots lobbying expenditures from lobbying campaigns. These disclosure rules would have revealed not only large spending campaigns seeking to influence legislation, but also the identity of groups or individuals who were behind the campaigns. Despite attempts in both the House and the Senate to pass tough grassroots lobbying provisions, neither chamber included the disclosure of this valuable information due in part to a misinformation campaign about the impact of the proposals.
Below are short descriptions of the major reforms in the legislation.
Stealth Coalitions
The new law addresses the problem of "stealth coalitions" — front groups with sympathetic sounding names that do not actually represent grassroots, community-based activism — by requiring registered lobbyists to disclose who is behind groups that:
- contribute more than $5,000 to the registrant or their client in a quarterly period, and
- "actively participates in the planning, supervision, or control of such lobbying activities".
