
IRS Request for Comments on Nonprofits' Use of the Internet
by Matt Carter, 2/22/2002
Text of the IRS request for comments on nonprofits' use of the internet.
IRS request for comments: Internet use by EOs
Request for Comments Regarding Need for Guidance Clarifying Application of the Internal Revenue Code to Use of the Internet by Exempt Organizations
Announcement 2000-84
The Internal Revenue Service is considering the necessity of issuing guidance that would clarify the application of
the Internal Revenue Code to use of the Internet by exempt organizations. Accordingly, the Service is soliciting
public comment concerning the application of Code provisions governing exempt organizations to activities they conduct on the Internet. The Service has made no final decision concerning the need for additional guidance of general applicability and may conclude no further action is necessary.
BACKGROUND
Exempt organizations, like other organizations, are increasingly turning to the Internet to carry on their activities. By publishing a webpage on the Internet, an exempt organization can provide the general public with information about the organization, its activities, and issues of concern to the organization, as well as immediate access to websites of
other organizations. An exempt organization can provide information to subscribers about issues of concern to the organization as well as enable people with common interests to share information via the Internet through a variety of methods (such as mailing lists, news groups, listserves, chat rooms, and forums).
General Issues
Exempt organizations use the Internet to carry on activities that otherwise can be conducted through other media, such
as radio or television broadcasts, print publications, or direct mailings. The growing use of the Internet by exempt
organizations raises questions regarding whether clarification is needed concerning the application of the Code to
Internet activities. The questions include the following:
- Does a website constitute a single publication or communication? If not, how should it be separated into distinct publications or communications?
- When allocating expenses for a website, what methodology is appropriate? For example, should allocations be based on webpages (which, unlike print publications, may not be of equal size)?
- Unlike other publications of an exempt organization, a website may be modified on a daily basis. To what extent and by what means should an exempt organization maintain the information from prior versions of the organization's website?
- To what extent are statements made by subscribers to a forum, such as a listserv or newsgroup, attributable to an exempt organization that maintains the forum? Does attribution vary depending on the level of participation of the exempt organization in maintaining the forum (e.g., if the organization moderates discussion, acts as editor, etc.)?
- What facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether informa tion on a charitable organization's website about candidates for public office constitutes intervention in a political campaign by the charitable organization or is permissible charitable activity consistent with the principles set forth in Rev. Rul. 78-248, 1978-1 C.B. 154, and Rev. Rul. 86-95, 1986-2 C.B. 73 (dealing with voter guides and candidate debates)?
- Does providing a hyperlink on a charitable organization's website to another organization that engages in political campaign intervention result in per se prohibited political intervention? What facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether the hyperlink constitutes a political campaign intervention by the charitable organization?
- For charitable organizations that have not made the election under section 501(h), what facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether lobbying communications made on the Internet are a substantial part of the organization's activities? For example, are location of the communication on the website (main page or subsidiary page) or number of hits relevant?
- Does providing a hyperlink to the website of another organization that engages in lobbying activity constitute lobbying by a charitable organization? What facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether the charitable organization has engaged in lobbying activity (for example, does it make a difference if lobbying activity is on the specific webpage to which the charitable organization provides the hyperlink rather than elsewhere on the other organization's website)?
- To determine whether a charitable organization that has made the election under section 501(h) has engaged in grass roots lobbying on the Internet, what facts and circumstances are relevant regarding whether the organization made a "call to action"?
- Does publication of a webpage on the Internet by a charitable organization that has made an election under section 501(h) constitute an appearance in the mass media? Does an email or listserv communication by the organization constitute an appearance in mass media if it is sent to more than 100,000 people and fewer than half of those people are members of the organization?
- What facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether an Internet communication (either a limited access website or a listserv or email communication) is a communication directly to or primarily with members of the organization for a charitable organization that has made an election under section 501(h)?
- To what extent are business activities conducted on the Internet regularly carried on under section 512? What facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether these activities on the Internet are regularly carried on?
- Are there any circumstances under which the payment of a percentage of sales from customers referred by the exempt organization to another website would be substantially related under section 513?
- Are there any circumstances under which an online "virtual trade show" qualifies as an activity of a kind "traditionally conducted" at trade shows under section 513(d)?
- Are solicitations for contributions made on the Internet (either on an organization's website or by email) in "written or printed form" for purposes of section 6113? If so, what facts and circumstances are relevant in determining whether a disclosure is in a "conspicuous and easily recognizable format"?
- Does an organization meet the requirements of section 6115 for "quid pro quo" contributions with a webpage confirmation that may be printed out by the contributor or by sending a confirmation email to the donor?
- Does a donor satisfy the requirement under section 170(f)(8) for a written acknowledgment of a contribution of $250 or more with a printed webpage confirmation or copy of a confirmation email from the donee organization?
