The Going-Out-of-Business Myth

The public needs regulatory safeguards to protect our health, safety, environment, civil rights, and welfare. Corporate special interests, however, have an interest in avoiding spending a single dime to improve their destructive behavior. Again and again, when new regulatory protections have been proposed, corporate lobbyists have argued that business would be bankrupted and forced to go out of business. Again and again, they have been proven wrong. Download our fact sheet "The Going-Out-of-Business Myth" to learn just how wrong they have been time and time again.

read in full

The Going-Out-of-Business Myth

Again and again, when new regulatory protections have been proposed, corporate lobbyists have argued that business would be bankrupted and forced to go out of business. Again and again, they have been proven wrong. Check out this fact sheet showing examples of cases when compliance cost estimates turned out to be overstated.

read in full

States fail to protect workers

An interesting new paper questions whether regulatory devolution from the federal to state governments has helped or harmed us. Taking advantage of what it calls a "unique historical anomaly" that some workplace health and safety protections are enforced in some states by the states and in others by OSHA, the paper looks at enforcement data in the construction industry -- and the states don't fare that well:

    read in full

    High Medicaid Costs Loom for State Budgets

    According to a new report issued by the National Governor's Association, many state budgets are near historical levels of growth. Only five states' revenues for fiscal year 2005 are below projections, while 42 states generated more tax revenue than they planned. Despite this good news, the NGA does caution in their report that Medicaid costs for long-term care and other services still threatens budgetary stability. NGA Executive Director Raymond Sheppach stated, "The continued rise in health care costs, spurred by Medicaid, continues to throw a wrench in the recovery of many states." Medicaid, in fact, has now surpassed education as the greatest overall expense to states.

    read in full

    Agency whistleblowers and experts at risk

    Two developments put at risk the agency workers who must draw conclusions contrary to industry's bottom line or who alert the public of malfeasance and inefficiency in government:

      read in full

      Failing to protect us, again

      More evidence that the Bush administration's pattern of failure to protect the public is still the administration's approach to public safeguards, from the AP: Nearly nine years after a fuel tank explosion caused the fatal crash of TWA Flight 800, safety officials say little has been done to reduce the flammability of vapors in aircraft fuel tanks.

      read in full

      How (un)safe are we?

      The bombings in London naturally reignite concerns about our own security against terrorist attacks. The NY Times is reporting that security measures in New York and across the country are being "tightened." How secure are we really? A recent report looked at the administration's failure to protect us from possible terror attacks on chemical plants, hazmat trucks, and more -- and linked those failures to the generous campaign contributions from the industries that the Bush White House is failing to regulate. Check it out at HomelandUnsecured.Org.

      read in full

      Estate Tax Effects on Small Farms and Businesses

      The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a report today called "Effects of the Federal Estate Tax on Farms and Small Businesses." The report, which was prepared at the request of Senate Finance Committee Ranking member Max Baucus (D-MT), looks at how family farms and small businesses are truly affected by the existence of an estate tax. Proponents of estate tax repeal often make the argument that the tax unfairly hurts family farms and small businesses. In reality, a number of exemptions for family farms and small businesses exist, which can serve to significantly lower the number of estate tax filers. This analysis, which uses data from 1999 and 2000, looked at the effects of freezing the estate tax exemption level at $1.5 million, $2 million, and $3.5 million. The report found that any of those expemtion levels, along with a 48 percent tax rate and a large Qualified Family-Owned Business Interest (QFOBI) would substantially reduce the number of small businesses and farmers affected by the tax. The estate tax needs to be reformed so that in 2011 (when it is scheduled to revert to it's pre-2001 form), family farms and small businesses are not unfairly burdened with the tax. However, as this report alludes to, repeal is not necessary in order to reduce the burden on family farms and small businesses. Deductions like QFOBI as well as raising the exemption level to one of the above-mentioned levels can work to do the accomplish the same end.

      read in full

      Sunset perspective

      With the White House's release of a proposal to give itself the power to restructure government at whim through the use of sunset and results commissions, it's worth revisiting an online conversation with Osha Davidson, Rolling Stone reporter who covered the sunset/results proposals back when they were first threatened, from the blogs Booman Tribune and

      read in full

      Creating Private Accounts With the Surplus is a Bad Idea

      The White House is continuing to push for legislation which would create private accounts funded by payroll taxes, even though Democrats remain almost unanimously opposed and some top congressional Republicans want to scale back such plans. Some House Republicans support Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas' (R-CA) proposal, which creates these accounts and while also claiming to move the program towards solvency. Yet although he has the support of some, many House members on both sides of the aisle continue to remain skepitcal about moving a solvency bill loaded with benefit cuts. As this Economic Snapshot from the Economic Policy Institute illustrates, the plan to create private accounts out of the Social Security surplus is less sound than it appears. As EPI says, "Proponents tout this plan as a way to 'stop the raid' on Social Security, but, like other privatization proposals, it diverts money from the trust fund and relies on infusions of general revenues to avoid worsening the trust fund balance." The Social Security surplus next year is projected to be around $85 billion. EPI estimates, "credits in the accounts would start at 2.2% of payroll in 2006 and shrink thereafter, dropping below 2% by 2009, below 1% in 2014, and to zero in 2017. Over 11 years, the typical worker would probably accumulate about three to five thousand dollars in such an account and face a comparable debt to the government."

      read in full

      Pages