Fly the friendly skies (but don't drink the water)

File this under "Yuck": the EPA has finished a second round of testing of airline drinking water and found that it's getting worse, not better. EPA found 17.2 percent of 169 randomly selected passenger aircraft carried water contaminated with total coliform bacteria -- up from 12.7 percent in the first round of testing. Although the coliform bacterium is not considered particularly dangerous in and of itself, it can be the sign that other, more harmful pathogens are in the water.

read in full

Super-waiver of all federal law coming back?

You might recall that Reps. Dreier and Hunter tried -- ultimately unsuccessfully -- in the 108th Congress to sneak into the 9/11 bill conference committee some language that would empower the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive all federal law, in the Secretary's sole and unreviewable discretion, in order to expedite construction of barriers in the final stretch of the southern border. The Congressional Research Service has completed a report on the legal and historical context of that issue, which you can download here.

read in full

Making sure that nothing sticks: EPA and DuPont

EPA is rigging the game for a Bush administration industry ally, this time DuPont. The Environmental Working Group has analyzed EPA's draft risk assessment on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a key ingredient of Teflon, and found that EPA has rigged the risk assessment in order to make its own brand of regulatory Teflon. The essence of the charge is that EPA "ignored its own science panel's guidance and internal industry research":

read in full

OSHA failed to protect its own workers from beryllium

The agency charged with protecting America's workers by ensuring that they have safe and healthy workplaces failed to protect its own employees, according to this statement from PEER:

read in full

Washington Post Series On Social Security

In an editorial yesterday, the Washington Post proclaimed that it plans to offer an occasional series of discussions on social security, in light of the recent onslaught of attention being devoted to the issue. The first article in the series can be read here. In the series on social security, the Washington Post hopes to explore many questions, including the following: What is the role of Social Security in today's retirement system? What is the size of the shortfall? What are the alternatives for addressing it? What are the risks and potential benefits of private accounts? How have they worked in other countries? Check the Post in the upcoming weeks for in depth coverage on the subject. Columnist Paul Krugman of the New York Times also continues to regularly discuss his feelings on social security reform in frequent op-eds. The latest can be read here.

read in full

Confirmation hearings today

The hearing everyone is talking about today is the confirmation hearing for Secretary of State nominee Condoleeza Rice, now live on TV or the web on C-SPAN. Also today -- likely to go under the radar because of Rice -- is the hearing for HHS nominee Mike Leavitt. Check in to see if any Senators will be asking about his record on child welfare services for abused and neglected children in foster care -- an area that will be under Leavitt's jurisdiction in HHS, and for which he has a miserable record from his days as Utah's governor.

read in full

Graham: Industry's Friend in the White House

<p>Learn more about John Graham, administrator of the White House's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, in this report and this Disinfopedia entry.

read in full

Yet more industry manipulation of science

Corporate special interests have a long history of trying to distort science in order to distance themselves from the harms they cause and avoid being held accountable. The usual story is that corporations leverage their money through think tanks like the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, which then produce studies that -- surprise! -- add a veneer of scientific credibility to industry talking points. The San Francisco Chronicle is reporting evidence of a more direct link between industry money and distorted science:

read in full

Ethics office studying disclosures

The Office of Government Ethics announced in the Federal Register that it will be studying current financial disclosure requirements for federal government officials. The public only has until Feb. 11 to submit comments. Keep in mind that there were efforts in the 108th Congress to reduce the amount of information required from national security officials. Without financial disclosures, it can be difficult for the public to hold its government accountable for conflicts-of-interest. Read the notice here: 70 Fed. Reg. 2,407 (Jan. 13, 2005)

read in full

Britain's Go At Pension Privatization

With all of this talk about social security, many analysts and politicians are looking to examples from abroad to either back their proposals or disprove others' proposals. One particular case getting a lot of attention is Great Britain. In her American Prospect article, "A Bloody Mess," author Norma Cohen discusses Britian's go at pension privatization approximately twenty years ago. In fact, it appears that there are basic similarities between what Britain enacted, and what President Bush may propose in the very near future; that is, a cut in guarenteed benefits with the option for beneficiaries to make up for those cuts by earning high returns on private accounts. Check out the article to see why there is now growing consensus in Britain that the privatization policy must be reversed. Paul Krugman also discusses the issue in a column today titled "The British Invasion."

read in full

Pages