The drumbeat for "entitlement reform," a euphemism for Social Security and Medicare cuts, has been getting louder. The main drum circle comprises the Washington Post's editorial board, the Senate Budget Committee, and the Bush Treasury Department. When they want to, they can make a frightful lot of noise. Thankfully, Dean Baker is around to check the facts.

Got a email from the nice folks over at OMB this morning about my blog post last week on the release of new PART scores and some of the shortcomings of the PART website. The email was surprising for two reasons: first, they read the BudgetBlog. (ok, so that's not so surprising as we all know everybody who is anybody reads the BudgetBlog.) Second, and perhaps more surprising, they have changed the spreadsheet that lists all PART scores that you can download from ExpectMore.gov to include a column for "Last Year Assessed." Now anyone can easily tell when the last assessment was done for each program. Fantastic! Way to go OMB! (I feel slightly more influential today than I did yesterday, which really wasn't very influential at all.) OMB also reported they are working to improve the search engine on the site so the most recent review links are returned when searching for programs. This is also excellent news, with one caveat: I'd still like to have access to the links to the older reviews available when I search, just not as the first items that are returned from the search engine. Instead of removing those links entirely from the search results (or from the site altogether), it would be better to list the reviews chronologically. Then users can tell when each assessment happened and allows them to compare between assessments to see what has changed. When I searched for our old friend - the Administration on Aging (AoA) - this afternoon, the search returned links to the 2007 review pages, but do not list those conducted in 2003. The links for the 2003 reviews no longer work. Since I suspect that OMB may read this and was very responsive in taking a previous suggestion of mine, perhaps I'll try it again. Here's what I'd like to see (click the image to enlarge):

1) Expand the posting of "Last Year Assessed" data to the summary view for each program, in addition to listing it in the assessment details page and raw data in spreadsheets. 2) Links to older assessments from previous years (where applicable) on the most recent summary view for each program. So for the AoA, you would be able to click on a link in the 2007 review that took you to all past reviews.

So a big thank you to OMB for incorporating some user suggestions to their website, and here's hoping we can keep improving it. If this works, I'm asking for the out-year discretionary spending details from the President's budget - those always seem to get leaked eventually, but it would be nice to have them upfront. Who knows how far this might go...

Sure, he talks a big game about "fiscal responsibility," but it's more a rhetorical tick than any sort of commitment to adequately funding national priorities. This week is emblematic of the president's bankrupt talking point.

The American people made their views on ending the war in Iraq abundantly clear on Nov. 7, 2006, firing the president's party's congressional majority. Later that week, President Bush proposed a "surge" of 20,000 additional American soldiers to be deployed in Iraq. Today, a majority in Congress supports withdrawal of almost all American military forces in the next year, two years, whenever is most immediately practicable. Now, President Bush is preparing us for the possibility of a permanant presence in Iraq.