New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

CBO Releases Cost Estimates for Bush FY06 Budget

It's been a busy news day for tax and budget news and the last item is the biggest. The Congressional Budget Office has released its estimates for the cost of President Bush's FY06 Budget. The CBO regularly estimates the cost of legislation and policies for the Congress and this report will greatly impact the way the Congressional Budget committees in the House and Senate write their FY06 budget resolutions, slated to be marked up by the committees next week. In their report, CBO estimates that President Bush's budget would keep deficits about $200 billion each year for the next decade and add over $1.6 trillion to the national debt that would otherwise occur if the policies were not enacted in that time period. CBO predicts a FY05 deficit of $394 billion and FY06 deficit of $332 billion. CBO also lowers the savings that would result from some of the president's cuts to mandatory spending. Overall, CBO estimates changes to mandatory spending would save $26 billion in FY06, not the $38.7 billion cited by the president. They also lower the estimate for savings in Medicaid and the S-CHIP program from $45 billion to $27 billion - almost half that amount. The most promienent conclusion in the report is surely that Bush will come up short of his promise to cut the deficit in half by 2009. It projects a deficit in 2009 of $246 billion, fully $40 billion short of Bush's goal. Further, neither Bush's budget nor the CBO report include many expensive future policies likely to be enacted, such as costs for overhauling Social Security ($1 to $2 trillion over 10 years), fixing the Alternative Minimum Tax ($754 billion over 10 years), or supplemental military costs for the wars in Iraq and Afhganistan (currently $82 billion for 2005). Despite this grim forecast, the administration and Republican leaders in Congress are steadfast in their support of making CBOs projections a reality by extending tax cuts to the wealthy without offsets to pay for them.

read in full

Greenspan's Testimony Garners Some Harsh Criticism

After testifying before the President's Panel on Tax Reform yesterday, Alan Greenspan received harsh crticism from one prominent Democratic Senator, Paul Krugman, and the New York Times editorial board. First off, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said yesterday on CNN's "Inside Politics" that has never been a big fan of Greenspan and criticized his testimony for giving the current administration a pass on deficits while promoting Bush's Social Security Policies. In typical Harry Reid fashion, he flings a zinger at Greenspan, calling him, "one of the biggest political hacks in Washington"read more Then today, op-ed columnist Paul Krugman writes, "In 2001, President Bush and Mr. Greenspan justified tax cuts with sunny predictions that the budget would remain comfortably in surplus. But Mr. Bush's advisers knew that the tax cuts would probably cause budget problems, and welcomed the prospect." Now that we are faced with budget problems, Krugman believes he sees Greenspan trying to provide cover. "And Mr. Greenspan has once again tried to come to the president's aid, insisting this week that we should deal with deficits 'primarily, if not wholly,' by slashing Social Security and Medicare because tax increases would 'pose significant risks to economic growth.'" read the op-ed And to make it three for three, the lead editorial in the New York Times suggests it is depressing it has taken Mr. Greenspan this long to suggest to Congress a tax increase to close the enormous budget deficit. They conclude "That should be a no-brainer, especially since the deficit - now at $412 billion - is largely due to tax cuts that President Bush and Congress have lavished on the most affluent over the past four years." read the editorial

read in full

Greenspan Testifies at Tax Panel Hearing

After testifying on the deficit and the economic state of our country yesterday, Alan Greenspan spent this morning as a witness before the President's Advisory Panel on Tax Reform. The panel held their second hearing today, and their third is scheduled to take place in Tampa on tuesday, March 8th. The third hearing will focus how the tax system affects businesses and entrepreneurs; a list of witnesses has not yet been released. At today's hearing Greenspan spoke in favor of a "mixed" tax system that relied upon both consumption and income taxes to bring in national revenue and keep the economy strong. Accoring to Congressdaily, Greenspan indicated "displeasure at the idea of a moving toward a value-added tax, noting that some believe it is too effective a tool for raising taxes. He also indicated that a value-added tax would be too opaque." Also appearing before the panel today were former Treasury Secretary James Baker, who indicated a preference for a consumption tax, and IRS Commissioner Mark Everson. These hearings are meant to serve the panel in their task to provide viable suggestions to Secretary Treasury John Snow on how to reform the federal tax code. Their report will be submitted to Snow no later than July 31st of this year.

read in full

Greenspan Testifies Current Deficits Are Unsustainable

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testified before the House Budget Committee yesterday and painted a grim fiscal picture of the current state of the federal government. Greenspan noted decreasing the current deficits would require Congress and President Bush to make difficult political decisions. He said both decreases in spending and paying for future tax cuts would be necessary to tackle the deficit. Greenspan emphasized his long-standing position for the reinstatement of pay-as-you-go rules (PAYGO). These rules, a key aspect of the deficit reduction package that worked well in the 1990s, would require Congress to offset further tax cuts or increases in spending with savings elsewhere in the budget. The Bush administration and many top Republicans in Congress believe PAYGO rules should apply only to new spending. Read more about Greenspans testimony.

read in full

Take Action on the Budget Resolution

Tell your members of Congress to oppose a budget resolution that would be harmful to many Americans as well as economically irresponsible. You can take action by clicking here.

read in full

Business Week Supports Estate Tax

An editorial in this week's edition of Business Week came out in favor of a fair and responsible estate tax as a means to generate needed national revenue. The editorial said this: "An estate tax that protects families, small farmers,and businesses can still generate tens of billions of dollars in revenues. Letting lapse the income tax cut of the highest income bracket could also generate billions of dollars of tax revenue that could pay for the teachers and emergency responders who will lose their jobs under budget proposals to reduce federal aid to cities. The budget also calls for cuts in Food & Drug Administration inspections of imported food and medicine -- right after a British plant supply half the flu vaccine to the U. S. was closed due to contamination."

read in full

Reconciliation Measures

Today's CongressDaily News Service reports that GOP Congressional leaders are discussing whether to move separate reconciliation bills for entitlement spending cuts and tax cuts in the reconciliation process. They are also discussing the possibility of potentially moving a third reconciliation measure to increase the debt limit, currently set at $8.2 trillion. The debt limit was increased last November. CongressDaily reports: "These are the clearest signs yet that GOP leaders are serious about trimming entitlements for the first time since the 1997 balanced budget agreement. Reconciliation offers procedural protections for revenue and mandatory spending bills after successful adoption of the annual budget resolution. By de-linking legislation mandating savings in entitlement programs from a package of tax cut extensions, sources said, Republican leaders would seek to avoid unfavorable comparisons already being voiced by Democrats. "They would be concerned if tax cuts and cuts in critical services are in the same bill because people might think spending cuts for programs like Medicaid are being used to fund tax cuts," said Thomas Kahn, Democratic staff director for the House Budget Committee." This would indeed be the case if both entitlement spending and tax cuts were passed in the reconciliation process. As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports, Bush's tax policies since 2001 account for 48% of our deficit, yet it is the spending on entitlement programs, such as medicaid and medicare, that are going to suffer from budget cuts in the name of fiscal responsibility. Keep checking the budgetblog for updates on the the reconciliation process as well as Congress' budget resolution.

read in full

Chapter on Iraq Excluded from Economic Report

It was reported in the Washington Post this morning that the Bush administration purposely excluded a completed chapter on Iraq's economy from its Economic Report of the President, which was released a few days ago. The National Security Council requested the chapter be removed, reasoning not that there was sensitive data that could lead to increased security concerns, but that the "feel-good" tone of the chapter would make the administration look bad amid continuing violence. This is an extreme and unprecedented decision by the Bush administration. The Council of Economic Advisors (CEA), who produces the report, is supposed to be an independent entity and its members have long prided themselves on their academic integrity. While there have been disagreements between White House staff and members of the council over past reports, the deletion of an entire completed chapter was described by former CEA members as "extraordinary," and "extreme." This decision paints a broader picture of the Bush administration and the CEA with respect to policy analyses. Former CEA member under President Reagan William Niskanen said this showed that the council had been significantly weakened. Others observers are afraid this is just one more example of an administration that does not value lengthy, reasoned analyses of its policies. A former policy advisor to Presidents Reagan and Bush I, Bruce Bartlett commented, "They just don't seem to show that serious study is an important part of politics. [The current Bush administration] takes a very casual, hands-off, almost lackadaisical approach to the policy process."

read in full

Options for Tax Reform

Last week the administration released the 2005 Economic Report of the President. The report includes - among other details - a chapter on options for tax reform, which the President has expressed interest in looking into during his second term. To look into tax reform options, Bush has put together an advisory panel on federal tax reform; you can see a list of the members of that panel here. Members of the panel met for the first time last wednesday to discuss how they can go about reforming the tax code to make it simpler, fairer, and more pro-growth to benefit all Americans. The panel will submit their recommendations to Treasury Secretary John Snow in July. Today's BNA news services reports that the Chairman of the panel, former Senator Connie Mack (R-FL), is calling for public comments to be made on problems faced by both individuals and businesses under current tax laws. Comments are requested by March 18th. See this page for more information on how you can submit comments to the panel.

read in full

Asking the Right Questions

Read this editorial in today's Washington Post for a quick and straightforward discussion of why President Bush's two additional tax cut proposals (that haven't taken effect yet) are unnecessary. These two tax cuts, which begin to phase in next year unless Congress acts, would go to the 4 percent of U.S. households with annual incomes of over $200,000, and would reduce government revenue by over $200 billion. The column asks the right question: given the growing record deficits and uknown future costs of war endeavors, "Why does President Bush think this tax break is necessary?"

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources