New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

Deficits More Threatening Than Terrorism, Survey Shows

The National Association for Business Economics (NABE) cunducted one of their biannual surveys from February 28th - March 8th of this year. The survey questioned economists, and results showed that a greater percentage of respondents believe the deficit is a greater short-term threat to Americans than terrorism. In the August 2004 survey, 40 percent of respondents named terrorism as the biggest threat, and 23 percent named the deficit the biggest threat. With 2004 deficit levels hitting a record high ($412 billion) and the President and Congress continuing to try to push through new tax cuts and extend old ones, it appears that many economists now view our deficit as a much more serious matter. In this survey, 27 percent of respondents noted the deficit as the largest threat, and 23 percent noted terrorism. The trade deficit, cited by 15 percent, and energy prices, cited by 11 percent, also rose in importance when compared with results from last August. Interestingly, 70 percent of respondents felt that Social Security had problems that need to be resolved, and the solution which received the highest rating (3.7 on a 5 point scale) was raising the retirement age. Privatization of the system received a rating of only 2.7. The rest of the results can be seen here.

read in full

Watcher: March 22, 2005

Federal Budget
  • House, Senate Pass Irresponsible FY06 Budget Resolutions
  • Smith, Kennedy Amendments Could Doom Budget Resolution
  • Despite Compromise, House Conservatives Could Threaten Budget Resolution
  • Bush Pushes Private Accounts as Public Support Drops
  • Bush, Congress Hide True Costs of Permanent Tax Cuts

read in full

Despite Compromise, House Conservatives Could Threaten Budget Resolution

On March 17, the House debated and passed the fiscal year 2006 (FY06) budget resolution by a vote of 218–214, one week after the House Budget Committee voted along party lines to report out the resolution. House GOP leaders managed a last-minute compromise with a number of conservative Republican members of the House Study Committee who threatened to vote against the bill in the weeks leading up to the vote — but final passage will still be very difficult.

read in full

Smith, Kennedy Amendments Could Doom Budget Resolution

The Senate narrowly passed its fiscal year 2006 (FY06) budget resolution late on the night of March 17 by a vote of 51–49. Several amendments from Democrats that would have greatly improved the bill, including one that would have required both spending increases and tax cuts to be paid for, were narrowly rejected. But two amendments dealing with entitlement and discretionary spending, which did pass, could cause irreconcilable differences between House and Senate versions.

read in full

House, Senate Pass Irresponsible FY06 Budget Resolutions

The House and Senate passed separate versions of the fiscal year 2006 (FY06) budget resolution last week that would allow for additional tax cuts, mostly targeting wealthy families, while cutting back on spending for programs that serve middle- and low-income America. A split within the GOP ranks may spell trouble for reconciling the two budget resolutions, and, as with the current year, would mean Congress would operate without a budget blueprint.

read in full

House and Senate Pass Budget Resolutions

Yesterday the House and Senate passed their respective budget resolutions for FY 2006. Both votes were very close with the House passing their resolution 218 - 214, and the Senate passing theirs 51 - 49. One main difference between the two resolutions that could cause problems in conference pertain to cuts in entitlement spending. The House budget resolution includes very steep cuts to medicaid, while the Senate version does not. Yesterday Senators passed an amendment offered by Gordon Smith (R-OR) to strip the budget of Medicaid cuts and instead create a one-year commission to recommend changes in the program. The amendment passed 52 - 48. While the President's budget proposal laid out $51 billion worth of cuts to entitlement programs, the House proposal upped that amount, calling for $69 billion in spending reductions on entitlements. The Senate bill included $17 billion in entitlement reductions after $14 billion in cuts to Medicaid were removed by Gordon's amendment. When Congress returns from recess in two weeks the two chambers will conference to square their budget proposals. Two major issues of contention will be their differing levels of entitlement cuts, as well as the fact that the Senate raised the level of discretionary spending for FY06 by $5.4 billion -- to $848.8 billion. These differences, coupled with the fact that the House already had to pacify unhappy conservatives to get enough votes to pass the budget, means there is a chance no resolution will be passed this year. To read more click here and here.

read in full

Feingold's PAYGO Amendment Barely Rejected By Senate

Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) introduced an amendment to the budget resolution today to fully reinstate pay-as-you-go (PAY-GO) rules. This amendment would require both changes to entitlement spending and any tax cuts to be offset in order to pass by a simple majority in the Senate.

read in full

Tax Cuts v. Medicaid: State-by-State Analysis

The budget resolutions currently under consideration in the House and Senate are in line with the President's priorities and propose cuts to Medicaid as well as the extension of tax cuts. The budget resolutions propose to cut funding for Medicaid by approximately $15 billion over five years, and in the same breath propose costs of $23 billion to extend dividend and capital gains tax breaks. As the Center for American Progress notes, "The Medicaid cuts would have important implications for states’ budgets and for health care for the poor. At the same time, the budgets under consideration contains tens of billions of dollars in new tax cuts, which would overwhelmingly benefit those best able to make the sacrifices necessary to reduce the deficit." The Center has compiled state-by-state data which shows how the proposed Medicaid cuts would affect individual states. To contrast these cuts, the Center also has data showing the magnitude of the proposed tax cuts in each state. The report can be read here.

read in full

Greenspan Testifies Before Committee on the Aging

This morning Alan Greenspan testified at a Congressional hearing on the Economics of Retirement. In his testimony before the Senate Special Committee on the Aging, Greenspan restated his support for the creation of private Social Security accounts. He is a proponent of these accounts partly because he believes diverting payroll taxes away from a fund that can be spent by Congress would allow lawmakers to see the true size of the budget deficit, and would pressure them to reduce it. He stated, "We need, in effect, to make the phantom 'lock boxes' around the trust fund real." Senator Clinton (D-NY) responded to these comments with criticism for Mr. Greenspan, whose 2001 testimony to Congress urging tax cuts to avoid a surplus, she said, "helped blow the lid off the lock box." The Bush tax cuts that Greenspan originally supported are currently largely responsible for our record-level budget deficit, and the fact that Congress must now cut spending on domestic programs in order to deal with this deficit. To read more about the hearing, click here.

read in full

Commentary on Tax Reform

In a Washington Post op-ed piece, former White House Chief of Staff and current President of the Center for American Progress John Podesta makes an excellent argument for how President Bush succeeded in 2001 in pushing through his tax cut plans and how progressives need to have a better strategy when responding to the President's Tax Reform Panel than was seen in 2001. In a first step to providing that better strategy, Podesta summarizes the Center for American Progress' alternative tax reform plan. You can read more about the Center's plan here.

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources