New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

Overtime Amendment Stripped From Omnibus Spending Bill

On August 23rd a new overtime rule went into effect revising the standards around who is eligible, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, to receive overtime pay. The Labor Department's rule raises the overtime eligibility threshold from $8,060 to $23,660 annually. When the rule went into effect there was widespread speculation that the changes could result in as many as six million workers losing their overtime eligibility.

In passing their versions of the FY 2005 Labor-HHS spending bill, both the House and the Senate voted against the administration's wishes and included overtime amendments in their versions of the bill. Those amendments, sponsored by Rep. David Obey (D-WI) and Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA), would have reinstated old overtime eligibility rules, and were seen as a major victory for workers.

The Labor-HHS spending bill will most likely be passed in an omnibus by Congress this week during the lame-duck session. Unfortunately, the amendment designed to curb the Labor Department's ability to enfore their new overtime eligibility rules will be stripped from the omnibus appropriations bill. As a Senate GOP aide stated, "We're heading toward most policy pieces being taken out of the omnibus.... They're time consuming, and the president won't sign most of them."

While it can be considered a theoretical victory that both houses of Congress supported important overtime amendments, it is definitely a significant loss that the amendment will be ultimately stripped from the omnibus bill. When the appropriations process is reduced to passing most of the bills through an omnibus however, it is not surprising that important policy amendments are not receiving the time and deliberation that they deserve.

To read more about the consequences of changing overtime eligibility standards, click here.

read in full

Watcher: November 16th, 2004

Federal Budget

read in full

Lame-Duck Work Begins This Week

Today, Nov. 16, the 535 members of the 108th Congress reconvened to begin a post-election lame-duck session and complete their unfinished business. Their goal is to keep the session short and productive, yet this may be difficult as Republican leaders have failed to reach an agreement with the White House on a package that could bring the fiscal 2005 appropriations process to a quick conclusion.

read in full

Economic Policy: Looking Ahead To A Second Term

As President Bush faces a second term, one of his first actions will be to define his goals and lay out agenda for the next four years. As Bush outlined on November 3rd, two of his most ambitious plans include both reforming the federal tax code and making changes to social security, all while continuing to fight a war against terrorism.

While this ambitious agenda is perhaps helped by the fact that the President has majority support in both Houses of Congress, it is hampered by some of the policy changes he forced through during his first term. Bush begins his second term with the economy in somewhat of a different state than he faced when first taking office. While in 2000 the nation enjoyed a healthy budget surplus, this year has the nation facing a large deficit as well as growing homeland security and defense needs. Federal tax revenue was $100 billion lower this year than it was when Bush first took office. On top of this, spending was $400 billion higher. This large discrepancy between revenue and spending has helped to create the largest budget deficit in our history. And, in response to four years of rising budget deficits, the Treasury announced on Wednesday that the government will borrow $147 billion in the first three months of 2005, to help fund its programs and policies. This level of borrowing, when it occurs, will be a new quarterly record.

Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution recently said, "On the domestic side, huge budget and current account deficits, historically low federal revenues as a share of GDP, the approaching retirement of the baby-boom generation, health care cost inflation, and escalating spending pressure for homeland security and defense will handcuff a president hoping to pursue new policy initiatives.

This administration will seriously be looking into trying to make permanent some of the tax cuts they passed over the last four years, and Bush has already laid some of the groundwork for this. Permanent tax cuts would greatly impact the amount of federal revenue collected by the government, and would cause even greater financial strain for agencies and institutions that rely on the government for funding. It is estimated that permanent tax cuts could cost the government $1 trillion dollars in revenue between 2005 and 2014.

When Bush sends his version of the budget to Capitol Hill early next February, it will clearly demonstrate how far this administration is willing to go to push the policies they outlined at both the Republican National Convention and on the campaign trail. For more information on second-term tax and budget issues, click here and here.

read in full

Watcher: November 2, 2004

Federal Budget

read in full

Upcoming 2006 Budget Process Portends Deep Discretionary Cuts

The FY 2006 federal budge, scheduled to be released in February 2005, is important now because federal agencies are already making decisions prior to submitting their individual budgets to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in September. The Bush administration has proposed cutting the budget deficit in half over the next five years, while John Kerry has proposed that he will do the same in four years. Because neither presidential candidate seems willing to cut funds from the Defense or Homeland Security programs, there is going to be considerable pressure for them to cut non-defense discretionary spending.

read in full

Completing Appropriations to Dominate Lame Duck Session

Only twice in the last 15 years has Congress been able to complete all 13 of the annual appropriations bills by the end of the fiscal year, and this year is no exception. To address this uncompleted business, the 108th Congress will reconvene Nov. 16 to begin a post-election lame-duck session.

read in full

"In These Times" Critical of Bush's Federal Economic Policy

"In These Times," a magazine committed to extending political and economic democracy, is publishing a series of retrospective analyses of the Bush record this week. Along with tackling foreign policy, education, health care, and a variety of other issues, the series highlights five different economic areas where Bush's policies have gone awry. The article focuses on:

- Bush's jobs loss record

- The unprecedented rise in home prices

- The overvalued dollar and the trade deficit

- The threat that structural budget deficits will continue far into the future

- The effects of massive military spending on the U.S. economy

The article can be found here.

read in full

EPI Studies Shed Light On Current Economic Situation

The Economic Policy Institute released two important studies this week that offer insight into how federal fiscal policies can and do impact people.

The first study, a book titled “Exceptional Returns: Economic, Fiscal, and Social Benefits of Investment in Early Childhood Development,” argues that increased investment in Early Childhood Development programs (ECD’s) will have financial payoffs for society in the future. If the government increases spending now to provide quality education and development programs for low-income children in the early stages of life, society will end up paying significantly less in the long run in terms of costs for remedial and special education, criminal justice, and welfare benefits.

The study highlights the fact that a publicly financed, comprehensive ECD program for all children from low-income families would cost billions of dollars annually, but would create much larger budget savings over time. Policies that will serve to generate billions of dollars in budget benefits should not be ignored. This month the Congressional Budget Office reported that the final deficit for FY 2004 was $413 billion; as this study proves, however, by investing now on current programs, society will end up saving a lot of money in the future. Click here for more information on the deficit.

EPI’s second report, released today, is called “Less Cash in Their Pockets: Trends in Incomes, Wages, Taxes, and Health Spending of Middle-Income Families, 2000-2003.” The report examines certain income trends and highlights the fact that the economic well being of middle-income families has changed significantly over the last few years; and that specifically, many middle-income families lost ground between 2000 and 2003 and now have less income available to meet their needs.

Both of these important reports can be found the Institute’s web site, www.epinet.org. Their findings call into question some of the economic policy decisions that have either been made, or overlooked, by the executive and legislative branches of this country. As we face the highest deficit we’ve ever seen, it is important to keep in mind both how tax cuts really affect the middle class, and what kinds of investments the government can make now to help our economy in the future.

To learn more about how recent tax cut legislation will affect the middle-class families, read this report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

read in full

Watcher: October 18th, 2004

Federal Budget

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources