I stumbled across a copy of the president's weekly radio address this morning and, for the life of me, can't figure out what Mr. Bush is smoking. The address summarized Bush's record on fiscal policy, stating outrageous claims like the president's tax cuts were a success, that Bush has enacted fiscal discipline in Washington, and that government spending imperils economic growth. These statements are all pretty much wrong, but the worst part of the speech was this: Over the past three years, we have met the urgent needs of our Nation while holding the growth of annual domestic spending close to one percent - well below the rate of inflation...By keeping taxes low and restraining Federal spending, we can meet my plan to have a balanced budget by 2012. Let's take a look at how well the president has met the urgent needs of our nation. Just recently, we've come across the following reports:

• New Hampshire may have to cut food and other assistance for the elderly;
• Hunger in America could be significantly curtailed if we'd only invest a little more;
• Backdoor cuts to Medicaid have drawn the ire of state Medicaid directors. Michigan is one state that has cut its Medicaid program;
• Delays and insufficient funding in the FY 06 spending bills threatened cuts to veterans health care, the Social Security Administration, the Food Safety and Inspection Service, the Small Business Administration, the FBI and DEA, Amtrak, and low-income housing programs - all of which have been operating on shoestring budgets over the past several years;
• The Walter Reed scandals appear to be a budget issue at its core with privatization of government services pursued to save money over delivering quality services;
• A growing number of sinkholes are increasingly becoming a problem around the country - mostly due to underfunded or neglected federal wastewater management programs;
• The Food and Drug Administration has largely blamed budget cuts and a lack of resources for their poor responses to recent food safety problems;
• The Center for Disease Control stated last week they lacked funding to put a plan in place to respond to a large tuberculosis outbreak;
• The president's own Millennium Challenge program, which provides funding to foster the development of poor countries, was running $400 million to $1 billion behind in January, 2007;
• Even funding for Iraq reconstruction has been insufficient and mismanaged;

Unfortunately, this is just the tip of the iceberg of unmet needs around the country the president doesn't even seem to be aware of. What's more, the president has presided over the largest increase in the national debt in history, as it has increased from $5.95 trillion to close to $9 trillion during his presidency. At this point, it's a little late for him to be shooting for a balanced budget in 2012 - 3 years after he leaves the White House. I'm afraid the damage has already been done.

To keep you up to date on the status of the appropriations process, we'll update and post the following chart indicating the status of each of the 12 federal spending bills. Each column represents a gatekeeper in both chambers for each bill - the responsible appropriations subcommittee, the full appropriations committee, and the full chamber. A green box indicates that the respective body has approved the bill and is awaiting approval of the next body. The number in each box is the dollar amount in billions that the body has appropriated.

The ECAP Coalition issued a statement on the 147 House Republicans who think it's smart to cozy up to the President and his severe budget: 147 House Republicans Cave to Pressure from Right-Wingers to Support Bush Veto and Cut Funding for Americans in Need Congress Has a Clear Choice: Stand with the President's Cuts to Health and Education, or Support America's Hardworking Families WASHINGTON, DC — According to press reports this morning, 147 Republican Members of Congress have caved to political pressure from the GOP leadership and special interests and signed a "Republican Study Committee" letter pledging to support a Presidential veto of any appropriations bill that increase spending on health care, education, and other critical needs for lower- and middle-income families. By signing the right-wing "Republican Study Committee" letter, Members of Congress were pledging to sustain a veto of appropriations measures sight unseen. Congress passed a budget last month that begins to reverse six years of misguided priorities in previous Republican budgets, but the White House has threatened to veto any domestic spending above the President's requested levels, claiming that these much needed and overdue increases would be too expensive. But the fact is that the President's budget would spend far more on tax cuts for millionaires than it would save from all of the cuts to domestic discretionary programs[i].

This afternoon, the Senate Appropriations Committee released the list of FY 2008 discretionary spending caps allocated to each of its subcommittees of jurisdiction, under Budget Act section 302(b). The House Appropriations announced its own 302(b) allocations on June 5.