New Posts

Feb 8, 2016

Top 400 Taxpayers See Tax Rates Rise, But There’s More to the Story

As Americans were gathering party supplies to greet the New Year, the Internal Revenue Service released their annual report of cumulative tax data reported on the 400 tax r...

read in full
Feb 4, 2016

Chlorine Bleach Plants Needlessly Endanger 63 Million Americans

Chlorine bleach plants across the U.S. put millions of Americans in danger of a chlorine gas release, a substance so toxic it has been used as a chemical weapon. Greenpeace’s new repo...

read in full
Jan 25, 2016

U.S. Industrial Facilities Reported Fewer Toxic Releases in 2014

The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data for 2014 is now available. The good news: total toxic releases by reporting facilities decreased by nearly six percent from 2013 levels. Howe...

read in full
Jan 22, 2016

Methane Causes Climate Change. Here's How the President Plans to Cut Emissions by 40-45 Percent.

  UPDATE (Jan. 22, 2016): Today, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) released its proposed rule to reduce methane emissions...

read in full
more news

Open-Gov Questions Candidates are Afraid We'll Ask

Elections are the time when politicians pay the most attention to people and issues, and therefore the best time to ask them questions about how they plan to govern. OMB Watch wants your help in figuring out the best questions on government transparency that can be put to the candidates. Take just a few minutes to answer our survey and vote on your five favorite questions on the issue of government transparency and openness. We will then share the top questions with the news media and other organizations that have direct contact with candidates. Government openness affects every issue from budget and taxes, to the regulatory process, to non-profit advocacy. The range of questions tries to reflect this breadth so check them and see which are most important to you. Take the Open Government: What We Need To Know Survey today.

read in full

Questions for the Year Ahead: Regulatory Policy Outlook for 2008

As Reg•Watch mentioned last week, in 2007, new regulatory policies and the inability of federal agencies to protect the public made headlines more so than at any time in recent memory. Newspapers continually ran stories on White House interference, unsafe imports, and new hazards being ignored by government despite scientific evidence imploring regulation.

read in full

AG Wants Answers: Was the White House Involved in the California Waiver Denial?

Today, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), in her role as chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, held a field hearing in Los Angeles on EPA's recent decision to block state action on greenhouse gas emissions. At least 17 states are seeking to adopt vehicle emission regulations to reduce emissions.

read in full

EPA Denies State Efforts to Curb Global Warming

The Bush administration rejected an attempt by California and several other states to combat global warming by placing a cap on greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. Stephen Johnson, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), announced the decision Dec. 19, 2007. Environmental advocates and members of Congress have sharply criticized the decision, and several states have already filed suit in federal court hoping to overturn it.

read in full

A Year for Failure: Regulatory Policy News in 2007

In 2007, new regulatory policies and the inability of federal agencies to protect the public made headlines more so than at any time in recent memory. Four themes dominated regulatory policy in 2007: White House influence over agency rulemaking activity and discretion; the inability of the federal government to ensure the safety of imported goods; the influence of industry groups; and the Bush administration's refusal to regulate in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence. Click on these links for a recap of 2007's highlights and lowlights:
  • White House Interventions

read in full

Update on Bush Changes to the Regulatory Process

Here's an OMB Watch update on President Bush's recent changes to the regulatory process and Congress's efforts to stop them: Congress Fails to Mitigate Executive Order's Damaging Impacts In January, President Bush made significant changes to the regulatory process by issuing Executive Order 13422. ( href="http://ga6.org/ct/H1A2jo41vc9H/">Click here for background.) Since then, OMB Watch has voiced its opposition to E.O. 13422 for three primary reasons:
  • It requires agency regulatory policy officers to be presidential appointees and gives them new power to start and

read in full

A Year for Failure: Regulatory Policy News in 2007

In 2007, new regulatory policies and the inability of federal agencies to protect the public made headlines more so than at any time in recent memory. Four themes dominated regulatory policy this year: an increase in White House influence over agency rulemaking activity and discretion, which added a perception of more political manipulation; the inability of the federal government to protect the public by ensuring the safety of imported goods; the voice of some industry groups calling for regulation; and the Bush administration's refusal to regulate in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence, as in the case of climate change. At best, government has attempted to respond to crises instead of getting ahead of the curve. This has left the public uncertain about whether we can count on our government to provide adequate safeguards.

read in full

Agencies' Regulatory Plans Available Online

On Monday, federal agencies released their semiannual Unified Agenda of regulatory and deregulatory actions. The fall version of the Unified Agenda also includes agencies' annual Regulatory Plan. The Unified Agenda lists all of the rules an agency is in the process of considering. It also lists regulatory actions completed since the last Unified Agenda and potential long-term actions.

read in full

Congressmen Press EPA on Transparency

Friday, Reps. John Dingell and Bart Stupak wrote to EPA administrator Stephen Johnson asking about the agency's transparency policies. The congressmen point out that previous EPA administrators have issued memos outlining proper transparency measures for agency activity but that Johnson has not. Dingell and Stupak do not identify any specific points of opacity or examples of EPA cover-ups; but one issue piqued Reg•Watch's interest. In their final question to Johnson (to which they request responses by Dec. 17), the congressmen ask the following:

read in full

The Flaws of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Case Example

Reg•Watch often complains about the flaws of cost-benefit analysis and the overemphasis policy makers place on it as a tool in decision making. However, when discussing cost-benefit analysis in the abstract, it is difficult to show the practical problems associated with its use.

read in full

Pages

Resources & Research

Living in the Shadow of Danger: Poverty, Race, and Unequal Chemical Facility Hazards

People of color and people living in poverty, especially poor children of color, are significantly more likely...

read in full

A Tale of Two Retirements: One for CEOs and One for the Rest of Us

The 100 largest CEO retirement funds are worth a combined $4.9 billion, equal to the entire retirement account savings of 41 percent of American fam...

read in full
more resources