FedSpending v2.0 Goes Live!

OMB Watch is pleased to annouce we have just released a new version of FedSpending.org with updated data, new features, and improved navigation. The new site is now live - see it yourself at www.fedspending.org. OMB Watch issued a press release that describes the updates and improvments made to the site, and you can learn and see more about FedSpending v2.0 in the About This Site section, or by exploring the site yourself. We welcome your feedback, comments, and questions about the new website, so please go to the Contact section of FedSpending.org and send us your thoughts.

read in full

OMB Watch Set to Launch FedSpending v2.0

OMB Watch will be releasing an updated version of our popular website FedSpending.org later today. FedSpending.org allows users to search and download extensive information about government spending going back to FY 2000, from contracts to grants, loans, insurance payments, and direct spending. Below are some preview screenshots of the new look and features of the website. The new site will go live later this afternoon. Be sure to check it out and explore the new features. New FedSpending.org Homepage with Features(click to englarge) Added Summary Outputs with Trend Chart(click to englarge)

read in full

Class Wars in the Budget

The Bush budget proposal assumed the repeal of the estate tax. Sen. Bernie Sanders's office juxtaposed what certain families would get from a repealed estate tax with assorted proposed cuts to social programs. Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone summed up the comparisons thusly: Sanders's office came up with some interesting numbers here. If the Estate Tax were to be repealed completely, the estimated savings to just one family -- the Walton family, the heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune -- would be about $32.7 billion dollars over the next ten years.

read in full

A Reich-Minded View of Balanced Budgets

Former Clinton administration Secretary of Labor Robert Reich blogged last week about Why Balancing the Budget is a Stupid Idea. It's almost impossible to agree or disagree with his reasoning, because he doesn't provide any. Oh, well, perhaps this part supports his argument:

read in full

Minimum Wage Rates, State-by-State

A set of Wall Street Journal graphics under the heading "Minimum Wage Debate" provides the following data:
  • minimum wages by state
  • median income by state
  • poverty rates by state
  • proportion in each state directly affected by minimum wage
Among other things, the graphics make clear that a majority of states now have minimum wage rates greather than the federal standard, that the nation's wealthiest cities and states tend to have the highest minimum wage rates, and that workers in the poorest states are most affected by changes in the minimum wage rate.

read in full

Inequality: The Search for Solutions

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has spent this week on Capital Hill addressing various Congressional committees on the state of the U.S. economy (we're doing OK). The topic du jure (de la semaine?), however, has been wealth and income inequality. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs chairman Chris Dodd's (D-CT) first question to Bernanake was: Do you share Chairman Greenspan's concern, Mr. Chairman, that continued economic growth of inequality is a significant threat to our nation's fundamental promise of economic opportunity? Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) followed suit and opened his line of questing with this: My first question deals with the issues of income inequality and the speech you gave yesterday, where you pointed out that this is just in an ideas, almost instantaneous economy, wealth agglomerates to the top. Wealth and income inequality is a real and growing problem (despite the carping of the Wall Street Journal's editorial board). Policy makers are now in hot pursuit of the causes and possible remedies (if any). Bernanke believes "[t]he very important drivers of economic growth and prosperity in this country include free and open trade and technological progress," but that the gains from these changes will have deleterious effects on some workers while "those who are going to benefit the most from globalization and technology are those who have the skills." In other words, income inequality is the result of an unequal distribution of education and skills.

read in full

Inequality Debate: What and Whither the Middle Class

Certain policy goals and objectives are supported by the premise that the American middle class is broadly participating in and benefiting from the nation's steady economic growth of the last generation on an equitable basis. Another set of goals and objectives relies on the notion that persistent wage stagnation, debt burdens, and a growing sense of class inequality afflict much of today's middle class. Even within the progressive movement, such a division exists today, and it was out in full view for all to see this week.

read in full

As the Wage Watch Wears On

The behind-the-scenes struggle over the shape and size of the minimum wage tax package (covered here, here, with an outside critque here) is intensifying, with the White House weighing in heavily and a group of GOP senators raising new objections. The Admin's Feb. 13 Statement of Administration Policy on H.R. 976 endorses the $8.3 billion small business tax cut adopted by the Senate in S. 2. It is not surprising the president favors more tax cuts, but the timing of this release throws more fuel on the fire heading into a conference negotiation between the two chambers.

read in full

National Health Care Could Save a Bundle

McKinsey, a nonpartisan consulting company, has answered my prayers and put out a comprehensive report on our overpriced, waste-ridden health care system. They even estimate tremendous savings from a national health care system. Steven Pearlstein makes the key point (emph. mine):

read in full

Cheney-nomics

Vice President Cheney, speaking to the National Association of Manufacturers yesterday: By now it's time for even the skeptics to admit that a lower federal tax burden is a powerful driver of investment, growth, and new jobs for American workers. And that increased economic activity, in turn, generates revenue for the federal government. Ummm...you mean even the "skeptics" at your very own Treasury Department? Even they say that permanent tax cuts will make the economy smaller and reduce revenues.

read in full

Pages

Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government