MSHA Finally Changes Course with Massey Energy?

Many of you have probably seen the NYT clip today about MSHA's decision to file suit against Massey Energy, charging that Massey has failed to cooperate with the investigation into a deadly coal mine fire: Federal mine safety regulators filed a lawsuit on Friday against one of the largest mining companies in the country in an effort to force its officials to cooperate with the investigation of a deadly fire in January at a West Virginia coal mine.

read in full

Latest Watcher

Be sure to check out the latest issue of our biweekly newsletter, The Watcher. Reg policy articles this time: Return of the Senior Death Discount?: Heinzerling v. Mannix

read in full

Risk Assessment Update

A quick look at recent developments related to the OMB Proposed Risk Assessment Bulletin:

    read in full

    Nanotechnology: Data Quality Act Strikes Again

    Environmental groups seeking stronger regulation of products containing nanotechnology, such as sunscreen and cosmetics, may be thwarted by the Data Quality Act, a provision that allows individuals (or industry groups) to challenge the integrity of government science.

    read in full

    More Bad News for the Environment

    BNA's subscription-only Daily Report for Executives has a nice summary of a stunning new EPA report showing that factory farms and paving are leaving nearly half of our streams polluted: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sediment Runoff Said to Pollute Nearly Half of U.S. Streams Nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment runoff are smothering fish and polluting nearly half of the nation's streams, according to a survey on the health of streams released by the Environmental Protection Agency.

    read in full

    The "Sound Science" Smokescreen

    Be sure to check out the new Knight-Ridder piece examining the strategic deployment of the term "sound science" to achieve decidedly political aims. Here's a taste: The Bush administration, senators, industrialists and farmers repeatedly invoke the term "sound science" to delay or deep-six policies they oppose and dismiss criticism of those they favor.

    read in full

    Industry-Funded Scientists Flood FDA Advisory Panel

    A science advisory panel for FDA is scheduled to consider new labeling guidelines for blood pressure control drugs tomorrow. Yet, according to information compiled by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, three-fourths of the 12-member panel received conflict of interest waivers. Many of those conflicts of interest relate directly to the issues of drug labeling to be discussed by the panel.

    read in full

    Spring 2006 Unified Agenda Now Available

    Agencies released their Spring 2006 regulatory agendas on Monday, April 24. To get the low-down on the agencies’ plans for the coming six months and what they accomplished in the last six month period, go to the Federal Register.

    read in full

    Linking Tobacco to Risk Assessments

    Tobacco industries employed scientists “to convince public health officials not that cigarettes were safe, but that there was not yet sufficient evidence of their danger to justify limiting places where tobacco could be smoked,” according to Environmental and Occupational Health Professor David Michaels. Now, under laws like the Data Quality Act, manufacturing doubt to keep harmful substances in the air and on the market is common practice. In a great Op-Ed for the

    read in full

    Good Jobs, Safe Jobs: Protect Workers Now

    Worker Memorial Day is coming up -- Friday, April 28. It is a time to reflect upon the vital importance of safety and health for the men and women of America who work for a living. Get more info here.

    read in full

    Pages

    Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government