Proxy Wars, Pt. I: Nussle Nomination

Senate Budget Committee chair Kent Conrad (D-ND) issued an unorthodox statement yesterday regarding the expected nomination of Jim Nussle to succeed Rob Portman as OMB Director: Representative Nussle and I had a very frank discussion today. While I understand the President's desire to appoint an OMB Director of his choice, a number of Members have spoken with me about their very real concerns about his nomination. Members expressed serious reservations about Mr. Nussle's reputation for confrontation.

read in full

Funding for IRS is Important

The House will soon pass the Financial Services/General Government appropriations (HR 2829). Its total funding should comes under the Presidents request, though the President has threatened a veto anyway, conditional on including provisions regarding abortion and Cuba. The media will probably focus on the fact that the bill may defund the OVP's office- in response to the OVP's clumsy claims, which we covered in the Watcher, that it is not a part of the executive branch, and therefore is not subject to disclosure requirements that apply to that branch.

read in full

GOP Sen. on WH Earmarks: "Hypocrisy? No, Duplicity"

An article in The Hill this morning quotes GOP Sen. Larry Craig (ID), responding to a question about whether President Bush was being hypocritical for requesting hundreds of earmarks even while criticizing them and vowing to cut the number of earmarks in half this year: "Hypocrisy? No, but one might call that duplicity."

read in full

Approps Update

Yesterday, the House approved a $27.6 Interior-Environment appropriations bill. Meanwhile, the White House shakes its fist at Congress threatening to veto the Interior-Environment bill, because the bill would breach the $933 billion discretionary spending cap requested by the president. (click to enlarge)

read in full

Conrad: Appropriations Deal Needed for Nussle Confirmation

Sen. Conrad says he wants to play hardball on the budget. He says he's going to hold off on holding the Senate's confirmation hearings for Jim Nussle, President Bush's nominee for OMB director, until they find common ground on discretionary spending. From the Washington Post:

read in full

The Long and Winding Road ... to Conference

On May 24, the House adopted H.R. 2316, the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 (aka, the lobbying and ethics bill), in a lop-sided 396-22 vote. The Senate passed S. 1, its own version of the bill back on January 18 almost unanimously, 96-2.

read in full

New Data on Contracting

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has updated its database of government contracting (you can also check out fedspending.org to search through contracting data). The House's website has interesting profiles of cases where contracting went wrong, and there's a very comprehensive report on contracting. What it doesn't have is a good narrative to explain why all this stuff matters.

read in full

Shut off Funding for Private Tax Collection?

The House Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee may try to kill the private debt collection program by shutting off its funding. Here's the story: The IRS' use of private debt collectors has retrieved millions in delinquent taxes but has raised questions about collection techniques and privacy rights. The House plans a vote this week on restricting the program's funds. Democrats critical of the program since it was approved by a GOP Congress in 2004 included only $1 million for private debt collection in the 2008 budget for Treasury Department agencies.

read in full

Inequality in England?

Our neighbors "across the pond" are getting concerned about inequality, too. Check out this article from the Guardian. It also makes the point that inequality might affect housing prices. So here are reasons why it does matter. For a start, house prices have gone mad, partly because too much money is chasing too little property, not just in Mayfair but in places like Doncaster, where City tycoons are buying up whole buy-to-let streets.

read in full

Means-Tested Exemption from Lobbying Ban?

True or False: Whether the laws of the United States governing the cooling-off period (currently one year) restrictions for former Congressional staffers to lobby their erstwhile offices apply depends upon the salary of these staffers. Answer: True (per Public Law 101-194). Now -- and no cheating -- staffers are exempt from these revolving door restrictions if they:
  • A. Were at no point one of the top-two paid staffers in a Congressional office
  • B. Received a total of $200,000 or more during their tenure as Congressional staffers

read in full

Pages

Subscribe to The Fine Print: blog posts from Center for Effective Government